2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2012.6364026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alien crosstalk mitigation in vectored DSL systems for backhaul applications

Abstract: The performance of digital subscriber line (DSL) systems, such as ADSL and VDSL is limited by crosstalk. Suppression of in-domain far-end self crosstalk using vectoring technology enables very high bidirectional data rates over twisted-pairs of copper wires. However, the performance of vectored DSL systems is severely degraded in the presence of alien or out-of-domain crosstalk that arises from sources that lie outside the vectored DSL system and share the same cable binder. In this paper, we propose a practic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar behavior is observed in the AXT mitigation methods, in which the rates of some lines achieve greater rates than other [10], [11], [12]. In [10] and [11], the lines are benefited distinctly due to the decision feedback structure, which provides more prediction taps for the last user, thus increasing the AXT mitigation, and, consequently, providing more rates for these lines. Conversely, in [12] the first lines appreciate the higher rates, because in this method the gains of each line are the diagonal elements of the upper-triangular matrix of a QR decomposition [13].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar behavior is observed in the AXT mitigation methods, in which the rates of some lines achieve greater rates than other [10], [11], [12]. In [10] and [11], the lines are benefited distinctly due to the decision feedback structure, which provides more prediction taps for the last user, thus increasing the AXT mitigation, and, consequently, providing more rates for these lines. Conversely, in [12] the first lines appreciate the higher rates, because in this method the gains of each line are the diagonal elements of the upper-triangular matrix of a QR decomposition [13].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The majority of the multiline AXT mitigation methods are based on steps in which the decoding is carried out iterativelly, in which the next lines (here we assume that the lines are organized in some order) need the information of previous lines to be decoded [10], [11], [12]. This structure allows the lines to share information and then the process is boosted.…”
Section: Rate Balancing For Axt Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%