2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2917-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aligning Civic and Corporate Leadership with Human Dignity: Activism at the Intersection of Business and Government

Abstract: From a tradition of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, however, the problem of the conception of human dignity itself emerges. For example, Lucas (2015) generally calls workplace dignity a phenomenon that is theoretically distinct from human dignity, while Kipper (2017) emphasizes the role of power imbalance, due to which dignity is not given to part of people. According to him, the violation of dignity arises due to mechanisms ensuring respect and attention for people who find themselves in an unfavorable situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, however, the problem of the conception of human dignity itself emerges. For example, Lucas (2015) generally calls workplace dignity a phenomenon that is theoretically distinct from human dignity, while Kipper (2017) emphasizes the role of power imbalance, due to which dignity is not given to part of people. According to him, the violation of dignity arises due to mechanisms ensuring respect and attention for people who find themselves in an unfavorable situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To combat arbitrary domination, Forst (2014: 22) advocates a fundamental “right to justification” based on the maxim that human “autonomy and dignity … consists in being subject to no norms or structures other than those which can be justified towards the individual.” Deriving from the premise that we are entitled to be treated as free and equal individuals and “independent agents of justice” (Forst, 2014: 22), this right to sufficient justification applies whenever our status as such is jeopardised (Forst, 2012: 37, 130; Kipper, 2017a). Universal in scope and reach (Forst, 2012: 2, 57–61, 212, 248), the right to justification entails both the provision and exchange of reasons, thereby encompassing the elements of both justification and legitimation (Forst, 2012: 7, 195).…”
Section: The Right To Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%