2015
DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2015.1015437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aligning economic and social value creation through pay-what-you-want pricing

Abstract: The main objective of social ventures is the creation of social value. However, these organizations must also generate and appropriate economic value to fund their social valuecreating activities. Mechanisms that enable the alignment of these seemingly contradicting goals are necessary. The authors propose that a participative pricing mechanism known as pay-whatyou-want (PWYW) is capable of aligning a venture's economic and social value creation goals. This mechanism allows customers to determine the price the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
19
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In PWYW, Kim et al (2009, p.47) show that social visibility (face-to-face interaction with the seller) makes consumers pay more than a price of zero because "most consumers will conform to social norms and may not want to appear cheap". Others report similar results (e.g., Kunter, 2015;Mendoza-Abarca and Mellema, 2015;Riener and Traxler, 2012) based on which we hypothesize: H1: Social visibility has a positive effect on the allocation of IRP to the prices to be paid (PTP) by the consumers in PWYW context, such that RATIO (PTP/IRP) is higher under public versus private settings.…”
Section: Social Visibility -Private Vs Publicsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In PWYW, Kim et al (2009, p.47) show that social visibility (face-to-face interaction with the seller) makes consumers pay more than a price of zero because "most consumers will conform to social norms and may not want to appear cheap". Others report similar results (e.g., Kunter, 2015;Mendoza-Abarca and Mellema, 2015;Riener and Traxler, 2012) based on which we hypothesize: H1: Social visibility has a positive effect on the allocation of IRP to the prices to be paid (PTP) by the consumers in PWYW context, such that RATIO (PTP/IRP) is higher under public versus private settings.…”
Section: Social Visibility -Private Vs Publicsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Several studies have explored the importance of social value creation as the outcome of SE (Srivetbodee, Igel & Kraisornsuthasinee, 2017;Mendoza-Abarca & Mellema, 2016;Dufays & Huybrechts, 2014;Hlady-Rispal & Bonclear, 2010;Dees & Anderson, 2003). In ensuring the maximisation the creation of social values among SE, the organisations (SE) should seek to enhance their performance by utilizing the resources available to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, SEs prioritize the satisfaction of social needs, while, on the other hand, they also need to create enough economic value to sustain and potentially expand their operations (Mendoza-Abarca & Mellema, 2016). The parallel pursuit of these objectives is a source of tension, as best efforts to solve social problems can be hindered by economic efficiency.…”
Section: Snes and The Four Challenges Of Sesmentioning
confidence: 99%