2012
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201100367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment of laser‐induced fluorescence and mass spectrometric detection traces using electrophoretic mobility scaling in CE‐LIF‐MS of labeled N‐glycans

Abstract: The combination of optical detection techniques like photometry (UV) or laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) with mass spectrometry for capillary electrophoresis offers advantages, both for later use of stand-alone CE-UV or CE-LIF systems and for combined CE-UV-MS or CE-LIF-MS analysis. Faster method development is enabled, the identification of analytes is facilitated, and it allows christian the optical detection scheme to be used for more precise quantification. However, shortcomings of current methodology and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28,[39][40][41][42] All other methods applied fluorescent labeling. Four methods used electrophoretic separation, which included conventional high-resolution capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence [CE-LIF(APTS-HR1)], [43][44][45][46][47][48] DNA-sequencer-aided fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis after 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) labeling for high-throughput screening [DSA-FACE(APTS)], [49][50][51][52][53][54] high-resolution capillary gel electrophoresis with rapid labeling with APTS via reductive amination [CE-LIF (APTS-HR2)], and cartridge-based capillary gel electrophoresis with rapid 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonate (ANTS) labeling, in development specifically for screening [CCGE(ANTS)]. The CE methods differ with regard to the labeling method: APTS labeling for the "normal" method requires 4 to 24 h for labeling, whereas rapid reductive amination has been optimized Three laboratories were involved in performing the experiments, an analytical laboratory in a development department, a quality control laboratory and a laboratory of a vendor of glycoanalytical tools.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,[39][40][41][42] All other methods applied fluorescent labeling. Four methods used electrophoretic separation, which included conventional high-resolution capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence [CE-LIF(APTS-HR1)], [43][44][45][46][47][48] DNA-sequencer-aided fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis after 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) labeling for high-throughput screening [DSA-FACE(APTS)], [49][50][51][52][53][54] high-resolution capillary gel electrophoresis with rapid labeling with APTS via reductive amination [CE-LIF (APTS-HR2)], and cartridge-based capillary gel electrophoresis with rapid 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonate (ANTS) labeling, in development specifically for screening [CCGE(ANTS)]. The CE methods differ with regard to the labeling method: APTS labeling for the "normal" method requires 4 to 24 h for labeling, whereas rapid reductive amination has been optimized Three laboratories were involved in performing the experiments, an analytical laboratory in a development department, a quality control laboratory and a laboratory of a vendor of glycoanalytical tools.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the use of common DNA sequencing equipment to perform glycan structure analysis by capillary electrophoresis is an excellent alternative to the established methods, with advantages in simplicity, throughput, structural resolution, and sensitivity (Callewaert et al, 2001; Huhn et al, 2012; Laroy et al, 2006; Reusch et al, 2014). Previously described CE techniques for antibody glycan analysis have focused on the analysis of whole IgG, as the large majority of monoclonal antibodies lack Fab glycan-sites (Ritamo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling of CE with optical detection and mass spectrometric detection could be an interesting way to improve information content. CE‐MS hyphenated with laser‐induced fluorescence or wavelength‐resolved fluorescence could provide a good platform for selective quantitative detection and identification in a single setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%