2014 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Software Product Management (IWSPM) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iwspm.2014.6891064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment of software product management and software architecture with discussion models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this limitation, in earlier work, we introduced the Reciprocal Contributions Model (RCM) [12]. It describes the relationship between the responsibilities of product managers and software architects as defined by literature in both fields [28], [30], and highlights the mutual contributions that enable these stakeholders to fulfill their own responsibilities.…”
Section: The Reciprocal Twin Peaks Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To overcome this limitation, in earlier work, we introduced the Reciprocal Contributions Model (RCM) [12]. It describes the relationship between the responsibilities of product managers and software architects as defined by literature in both fields [28], [30], and highlights the mutual contributions that enable these stakeholders to fulfill their own responsibilities.…”
Section: The Reciprocal Twin Peaks Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) artifacts, denoted as rectangles, produced trying to reach the responsibilities as we identified in [12]; and (4) artifact flows. We explain each element from top to bottom by means of a running example: BankProd, a fictitious software product of a company from the Netherlands that, among On a daily basis Alice, BankProd's product manager, receives new market requirements.…”
Section: The Reciprocal Twin Peaks Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, due to many external constraints, such as time-to-market, proper architectural documentation comes at the bottom of the list. Consequently, many of these organisations have outdated documentation [12]. Thus the risk of technical debt is high for such organisations [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%