“…Nevertheless, many others have concluded that immunosuppression, septic shock, fecal peritonitis, or high cardiac risk patients at admission were correlated with higher morbidity and mortality rates, and that usage of a two-stage procedure with or without primary anastomosis would be safer than one-stage surgery. [1,5,16,18] There is no comment about the timing of the second stage of the operation, but most of the authors favor delaying the second stage, usually preferring to perform it 6 months after the first stage. [14,18] In conclusion, colon perforation due to immunoUnexpected colonic perforation in a renal recipient Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg suppressant use in renal allograft recipients is a rare but serious complication, with high mortality and morbidity rates.…”