2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alive and kicking: Why dormant soil microorganisms matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
110
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 270 publications
3
110
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated behavior of microbial functional groups supports experimental evidence of the importance of metabolic activation/deactivation strategies by microbial functional groups for regulating C turnover in soil (Placella et al, 2012;Joergensen and Wichern, 2018;Salazar et al, 2019). Our finding that interactions between microbial functional groups are controlled by the spatial localization of microorganisms is in agreement with previous results from individual-based modeling (Allison, 2005;Kaiser et al, 2015;Portell et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulated behavior of microbial functional groups supports experimental evidence of the importance of metabolic activation/deactivation strategies by microbial functional groups for regulating C turnover in soil (Placella et al, 2012;Joergensen and Wichern, 2018;Salazar et al, 2019). Our finding that interactions between microbial functional groups are controlled by the spatial localization of microorganisms is in agreement with previous results from individual-based modeling (Allison, 2005;Kaiser et al, 2015;Portell et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…SpatC accounts for three functional microbial types: oligotrophs (B O ), copiotrophs (B C ) and copiotrophic cheaters (B CC ) (Equations 7-11). All microbial groups are considered to be able to switch from an active to a dormant physiological state (Lennon and Jones, 2011;Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov, 2013;Joergensen and Wichern, 2018) with different parameterizations for different functional types (Table 1, Figure 2). Active microorganisms use dissolved small biopolymers and monomers for growth, while dormant microorganisms do not grow.…”
Section: Functional Microbial Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this was not represented by lower SOM accumulation in soil B as SOC content in both soils was the same, probably because the qCO 2 was on an overall low level as compared to other studies (Wichern et al, 2003(Wichern et al, , 2006Hartman and Richardson, 2013;Iqbal et al, 2016). Further, next to C lost as CO 2 for a full microbial CUE assessment also microbial necromass and other microbial metabolites need to be considered (Joergensen and Wichern, 2018), which we were not able to do in the present study. However, it can be concluded that short term abiotic stress, such as salinity or anoxic conditions, does not directly trigger metabolic adaptation of the whole microbial community, but rather results in survival of the microbes better adapted to stress and likely having adapted energy intensive metabolic mechanisms as explained above.…”
Section: Distinct Microbial Response Of Different Soils Indicate Soilcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The relative increase of saprotrophic fungi as indicated by the ergosterol-to-microbial biomass C ratio was positively related to an increase of the metabolic quotient qCO 2, a simple indicator of the demand of microorganisms to maintain their biomass or a simplified carbon use efficiency (CUE) (Joergensen and Wichern, 2018) Consequently, increased fungal dominance will result in lower C use efficiency as shown earlier (Nannipieri et al, 2003;Iqbal et al, 2016) and may result in organic matter loss in the long run. A higher specific metabolic activity may reflect stronger catabolic activity and production of osmolytes, cell repair or detoxification (Jones et al, 2019) and thus reflects an adaptation of the soil microbial community to abiotic stress, such as salinity (Wichern et al, 2006).…”
Section: Distinct Microbial Response Of Different Soils Indicate Soilmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…). However, dormant microbial communities within soil have also been hypothesized to be powerful pools of potential diversity and can respond rapidly to changes in environmental inputs (Joergensen and Wichern , Kearns and Shade , Nelson et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%