The hydrogen‐releasing activity of (LiNH2)6–LiH nanoclusters and metal (Na, K, or Mg)‐cation substituted nanoclusters (denoted as (NaNH2)(LiNH2)5, (KNH2)(LiNH2)5, and (MgNH)(LiNH2)5) are studied using ab initio molecular orbital theory. Kinetics results show that the rate‐determining step for the dehydrogenation of the (LiNH2)6–LiH nanocluster is the ammonia liberation from the amide with a high activation energy of 167.0 kJ mol−1 (at B3LYP/6‐31 + G(d,p) level). However, metal (Na, K, Mg)‐cation substitution in amide–hydride nanosystems reduces the activation energies for the rate‐determining step to 156.8, 149.6, and 144.1 kJ mol−1 (at B3LYP/6‐31 + G(d,p) level) for (NaNH2)(LiNH2)5, (KNH2)(LiNH2)5, and (MgNH)(LiNH2)5, respectively. Furthermore, only the −NH2 group bound to the Na/K cation is destabilized after Na/K cation substitution, indicating that the improving effect from Na/K‐cation substitution is due to a short‐range interaction. On the other hand, Mg‐cation substitution affects all –NH2 groups in the nanocluster, resulting in weakened N–H covalent bonding together with stronger ionic interactions between Li and the –NH2 group. The present results shed light on the dehydrogenation mechanisms of metal‐cation substitution in lithium amide–hydride nanoclusters and the application of (MgNH)(LiNH2)5 nanoclusters as promising hydrogen‐storage media.