2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2017.8217675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALL-CQS: Adaptive locality-based lossy compression of quality scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is currently research concerned specifically on quality scores compression. 75,76 Since this article is focused on developing a referential compressor for the read sequences stream, the compression of identifiers and quality scores is performed using third-party software. Considering the compression ratio, running times, and software dependencies as reported in a previous study, 25 we selected QUIP 1.1.8.…”
Section: Packing and Unpackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently research concerned specifically on quality scores compression. 75,76 Since this article is focused on developing a referential compressor for the read sequences stream, the compression of identifiers and quality scores is performed using third-party software. Considering the compression ratio, running times, and software dependencies as reported in a previous study, 25 we selected QUIP 1.1.8.…”
Section: Packing and Unpackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category, of QSD lossy compressors, includes QualComp ( Ochoa et al 2013 ), RQS ( Yu et al 2014 ), P/R-Block ( Cánovas et al 2014 ), Quartz ( Yu et al 2015 ), QVZ ( Malysa et al 2015 ), QVZ2 ( Hernaez et al 2016 ), GeneCodeq ( Greenfield et al 2016 ), CROMqs ( No et al 2020 ), ( Fu and Dong 2017 ), Qscomp (lossy) ( Voges et al 2018 ), Crumble ( Bonfield et al 2019 ), ScaleQC ( Yu and Yang 2020 ), and so forth. Those methods overlook the dependence of downstream applications on the initial QSD usage, making the exploration of lossless compressors continue to be a prominent research direction, especially in long-term backup scenarios where data integrity is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most algorithms proposed to compress FASTQ quality scores were lossy compression methods ( Cánovas et al, 2014 ; Malysa et al, 2015 ; Fu and Dong, 2017 ; Suaste and Houghten, 2021 ). The effect of lossy compression of quality scores on variant calling was also studied ( Ochoa et al, 2016 ), and showed that the lossy compression can maintain variant calling performance comparable to that with the original data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%