All different, all equal: Evidence of a heterogeneous Neolithic population at the Bom Santo Cave necropolis (Portugal)

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to contribute to the discussion regarding the socio-political organization of south-western Iberian Middle Neolithic populations. To that end, the preservation and distribution of human remains and the dispersion of grave goods within two rooms of the Bom Santo Cave (Rooms A and B) were investigated and combined with genetic and isotopic data previously published. Grave goods distribution and skeletal analyses highlighted an important diversity in terms of funerary practices thus corroborating data from ancient DNA and Sr/O isotopic analyses that suggested a great genetic and geographic diversity. Grave goods presented an uneven spatial distribution and were made of raw materials from different sources and using different pottery manufacturing styles albeit typologically homogeneous. The preservation and distribution of human remains suggested that Room A was mainly used for secondary depositions while Room B was used for both primary and secondary depositions. No link between the two rooms was found since remains from the same individuals were apparently exclusive of one room or another. The results suggest that this society presented substantial inner genetic, social and geographical heterogeneity. Most probably, this was due to the presence of distinct but coeval groups in the cave that shared a larger-scale social identity (as in "segmentary societies") or, less likely, to the presence of one single, but internally heterogeneous society (as in fully sedentary societies) that assimilated foreigners.

The Enactive Approach to Architectural Experience: A Neurophysiological Perspective on Embodiment, Motivation, and Affordances

“…Additional knowledge comes from the studies particularly focused on the emotional aspect elicited by a VR experience. As described in Diemer et al ( 2015 ), these studies used the VR as a medium for investigating emotional responses, e.g., sadness, joy, relaxation (Baños et al, 2004 , 2008 ), anxiety (Juan and Pérez, 2009 ), arousal (Freeman et al, 2005 ), fear (Diemer et al, 2015 ; Peperkorn et al, 2015 ), and their relationship with presence. In the work of Riva et al ( 2007 ), authors used a HMD to immerge participants in a virtual open space green park that was represented in three different fashions (relaxing, anxious, and neutral).…”

Two examples of anthropic manipulation and postmortem processing of human remains at megalithic sites in inland Iberia: La Cabaña and Los Zumacales (Spanish northern sub‐plateau)

“…Nonetheless, in some tombs, a repeated absence of some anatomical elements has been observed, which raises questions regarding the state of the bodies at the point of deposition in those megalithic structures (Chambon, 2000, 2003; Crubézy, 2021). At present, greater flexibility is considered in the interpretation of the assemblages, encompassing a wide range of funerary actions during hundreds of years of burials in megalithic mortuary spaces (Beckett, 2011; Fernández‐Crespo, 2015; Gonçalves et al, 2016; Leclerc, 1990; Silva et al, 2019, 2021; Smith & Brickley, 2009; Vílchez Suárez et al, 2023).…”

The preburning condition of Chalcolithic cremated human remains from the Perdigões enclosures (Portugal)

“…The atypical frequency of specific skeletal elements may relate to the funerary rite, and thus, this criterion has been previously used to infer primary versus secondary depositions (Andrews & Bello, ; Bello & Andrews, ; Duday & Guillon, ; Gonçalves, Granja, Alves‐Cardoso, & Carvalho, ; Roksandic, ). This is because secondary depositions often involve deliberate selection of specific skeletal elements (e.g., crania and long bones) or because collection and transport of skeletal elements often occur after decomposition, hence resulting in the loss of small bones from labile joints such as the ones from the hands and feet (Duday, ; Duday & Guillon, ; Roksandic, ).…”