2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1512.00367
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All finite subdivision rules are combinatorially equivalent to three-dimensional subdivision rules

Brian Rushton

Abstract: Finite subdivision rules in high dimensions can be difficult to visualize and require complex topological structures to be constructed explicitly. In many applications, only the history graph is needed. We characterize the history graph of a subdivision rule, and define a combinatorial subdivision rule based on such graphs. We use this to show that a finite subdivision rule of arbitrary dimension is combinatorially equivalent to a three-dimensional subdivision rule. We use this to show that the Gromov boundary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of creating a history graph can be reversed; in [10], we defined a combinatorial subdivision graph as a graph Ξ which contains a family of disjoint subgraphs Ξn such that:…”
Section: History Graphs and Combinatorial Subdivision Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of creating a history graph can be reversed; in [10], we defined a combinatorial subdivision graph as a graph Ξ which contains a family of disjoint subgraphs Ξn such that:…”
Section: History Graphs and Combinatorial Subdivision Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%