2020
DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1829989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All for one and one for all? Integration in high-performance sport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sykes discussed the complexities and contradictions of the Pride Houses as a “new form of sporting settler homonationalism” that was founded upon, and reproduced, settler colonial discourses about participation and displacement of Two-Spirit youth and Indigenous people (Sykes, 2016 , p. 54). In another recent study, Quinn et al ( 2020 ) examined the way sporting events that purport to be inclusive of athletes with a disability, serve to reinforce norms of able-bodiedness through discursive practices and spatialized approaches to sport services. In this case, where sport managers unanimously believed the model of integration was a fitting approach to be inclusive, those with direct sporting experiences (athletes and coaches) critically discussed the complexity of this practice and need to collectively resist these “unifying” narratives.…”
Section: Findings: Approaches To Community In Sport Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sykes discussed the complexities and contradictions of the Pride Houses as a “new form of sporting settler homonationalism” that was founded upon, and reproduced, settler colonial discourses about participation and displacement of Two-Spirit youth and Indigenous people (Sykes, 2016 , p. 54). In another recent study, Quinn et al ( 2020 ) examined the way sporting events that purport to be inclusive of athletes with a disability, serve to reinforce norms of able-bodiedness through discursive practices and spatialized approaches to sport services. In this case, where sport managers unanimously believed the model of integration was a fitting approach to be inclusive, those with direct sporting experiences (athletes and coaches) critically discussed the complexity of this practice and need to collectively resist these “unifying” narratives.…”
Section: Findings: Approaches To Community In Sport Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, organizations frequently hold separate training camps for their Olympic and Paralympic teams and have different coaches and staff assigned to each group. The parallel arrangement of the Olympic Games followed a few weeks later by the Paralympic Games is an example of how competitions reproduce segregation whereas the Commonwealth Games that include events for athletes with and without disabilities is one of the few examples of an integrated competition in elite sport (Quinn et al, 2020). While much has been written on integration in sport contexts including exploring attitudes toward disability amongst those directly involved in integrated events (see for example, Misener et al, 2015;Paradis et al, 2017;Quinn et al, 2020), managerial perspectives on integration policies and sport delivery (Kitchin and Howe, 2014;Hammond et al, 2021) and the experiences of para-athletes in integrated organizations (Howe, 2007), little research has considered how the implications of integration shape and constrain athlete wellbeing.…”
Section: Ableist Structures and Psycho-emotional Disablismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that experiences and discourses around sports mostly internalize and take ableism-based identities as a given [183,188,190], and ableism is one reason for why disability sports have largely been ignored, in the context of diversity management in sports [196]. It is argued that it is critical to understand "ableism and how ableistic ideology informs sporting theory, sport science and sport management" [197] (p. 5).…”
Section: The Issue Of Ableismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ableism is also used as a conceptual framework, to call out ability-based discriminations against disabled people within the kinesiology, sports, physical education, and physical education literature [91,149,151,[183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194]. Ableism is seen as one reason for the invisibility of disabled people and their problems in many subject topics and degrees [196], and it is argued that it is critical to understand "ableism and how ableistic ideology informs sporting theory, sport science and sport management" [197] (p. 5), and a "different ability curriculum, which destabilises notions of normativity and challenges the status quo regarding ability" is needed [194] (p. 518). As such, the problems indicated in sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, under the concept of ableism, suggest the need for critical evaluation of EDI frameworks and policies developed under EDI phrases that are applied to disabled people, which sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology are well situated to provide.…”
Section: The Issue Of Ableismmentioning
confidence: 99%