‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research

Abstract

Background Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for answers in examples shared across networks, published case studies, guidance and research articles. Pulling these strands together, the UK Standards for Public Involvement provides six statements (standards) about public involvement in research. They were produced by a partnership of organisations from Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England with contributions from involvement practitioners, public partners, researchers and research funders. Main body Each standard has reflective questions, which are designed to encourage standard users to use approaches and behaviours that improve involvement, over time. The standards are designed to be used as a practical tool, and reflect the agreed hallmarks of good public involvement in research for example, flexibility in approaches used, shared learning, and mutual respect. The standards development process is described from the initial idea and scoping, via the appraisal of existing standard sets and integration of values and principles in public involvement in research. The collaborative writing process of and consultation on the draft standard set is described, together with what changed as a result of feedback. The initiation of a year-long testing programme with forty participating research organisations, the experiential feedback and the resulting changes to the standards is summarised. Conclusion This commentary paper describes, in some detail, a process to develop a set of six standards for public involvement in research in the UK. Producing a complex, national public involvement initiative is not without its challenges, and in supplementary material partnership members reflect on and share their experiences of standards development. The next phase of integration and implementation is explored with concluding comments from those that tested and helped improve the standards.

Involving older adults in technology research and development discussions through dialogue cafés

“…However, in DC2 one group leader reported that everybody had viewpoints on the illustrations and that Nora and Helmer contributed to opening discussions. Overall, the experience of the project group, in line with Crowe et al [ 47 ], was that using the illustrations of Nora and Helmer facilitated reflections and mutual learning between researchers and participants.…”

Are we asking the right questions? Working with the LGBTQ+ community to prioritise healthcare research themes

“…We used the UK Standards for Public Involvement [20] to guide our work with the public, and in reporting this project, we use the GRIPP 2 checklist [21] so that the specific elements of public involvement are described and evaluated.…”

Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers

“…We recruited two more service users to the Trial Steering Committee through Involving People (http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/page.cfm?orgid=1023&pid=59261) to ensure their independence. We followed best practice by ensuring all users received honoraria, expenses, training and support, a named contact, information and networking opportunities [42].…”