All on board? New evidence on board gender diversity from a large panel of European firms

Abstract

Using a unique database of over 20 million firms over two decades, we examine industry sector and national institution drivers of the prevalence of women directors on supervisory and management boards in both public and private firms across 41 advanced and emerging European economies. We demonstrate that gender board diversity has generally increased, yet women remain rare in both boards of firms in Europe: approximately 70% have no women directors on their supervisory boards, and 60% have no women directors on management boards. We leverage institutional and resource dependency theoretical frameworks to demonstrate that few systematic factors are associated with greater gender diversity for both supervisory and management boards among both private and public firms: the same factor may exhibit a positive correlation to a management board, and a negative correlation to a supervisory board, or vice versa. We interpret these findings as evidence that country-level gender equality and cultural institutions exhibit differentiated correlations with the presence of women directors in management and supervisory boards. We also find little evidence that sector-level competition and innovativeness are systematically associated with the presence of women on either board in either group of firms.

Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures

“…That is, under the resource dependence theory, it is assumed that boards serve to link the company to other external organisations in order to address environmental dependencies (Reguera‐Alvarado, de Fuentes, & Laffarga, 2017). As Tyrowicz, Terjesen, and Mazurek (2020) mention, the resource dependency theory explores how boards aim to reduce uncertainty by appointing corporate directors who can maximise access to valuable resources required by the firm. In a similar vein, Carter et al (2010) argue that the resource dependency theory provides a reasonable basis for justifying diversity on a firm's board, which contributes to a more effective decision making.…”

Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions

“…Around the world, other countries seek to improve the level of representation of women, such as France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Malaysia, the Netherlands, and Spain. They have mandatory quotas ranging from 30% to 40% (Miller & del Carmen Triana, 2009; Terjesen, Sealy, & Singh, 2009; Tyrowicz, Terjesen, & Mazurek, 2020), whereas Finland, India, and the United Arab Emirates have mandated the presence of at least one woman on boards. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether gender is actually the most significant dimension of board diversity and there is considerably less research examining other characteristics.…”

Emotionally intelligent top management and high family firm performance: Evidence from Germany

“…Since the majority of our sampled CEOs were male and the research acknowledged that male CEOs may lead differently compared to female CEOs (Fitzsimmons, Callan, & Paulsen, 2014;Glass & Cook, 2016;Tyrowicz, Terjesen, & Mazurek, 2020), particularly in terms of dealing with their own and others' emotions, we believe that further studies of gender issues at the top of family firms, in conjunction with the EI and leadership style factors dealt with here, could be of added value for many family-firm practitioners.…”