2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups in Primary Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Charnley classification and the preoperative value of the outcome examined contributed most to the models' predictive power rather than the three comorbidity measures tested. Similarly, Lavernia et al [14] found comorbidity scores correlated poorly with patient pain level and functional abilities after total joint arthroplasty. Interestingly, Charnley classification had stronger predictive power than the patient preoperative health state for the EQ-5D index, EQ VAS, and, most evidently, for the postoperative pain VAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Charnley classification and the preoperative value of the outcome examined contributed most to the models' predictive power rather than the three comorbidity measures tested. Similarly, Lavernia et al [14] found comorbidity scores correlated poorly with patient pain level and functional abilities after total joint arthroplasty. Interestingly, Charnley classification had stronger predictive power than the patient preoperative health state for the EQ-5D index, EQ VAS, and, most evidently, for the postoperative pain VAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…33 Finally, we used the EDW to retrieve demographic and other covariates, including age, gender, race, insurance, calendar month of hospitalization, and severity of illness (SOI) using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups. 34 For PCH, asthma discharges between We included baseline data back to 2003 to take into account any preexisting secular trends.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC is an effective method for quantifying the discriminatory capacity of a diagnostic test to correctly classify patients with and without infection in which it is defined as Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. [12]. In 2013, the Universal American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator was developed for use across all surgical subspecialties and covering 2500 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%