2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excised

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The incidence of premalignant or malignant histology in radial scars in this study is comparable with rates reported in the literature. Fasih et al 10 have reported rates from the Newcastle breast screening programme of 67% for pure radial scars, 17% for ADH and 16% for in situ or invasive carcinoma, compared with 68%, 18% and 14% (including LCIS), respectively, in this study. Lower, but comparable, results have been shown in a retrospective analysis of 175 patients with screen-detected radial scars, 11 showing concurrent carcinoma in 3% and carcinoma in situ in 5% (5% and 7%, respectively, in this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…9 The incidence of premalignant or malignant histology in radial scars in this study is comparable with rates reported in the literature. Fasih et al 10 have reported rates from the Newcastle breast screening programme of 67% for pure radial scars, 17% for ADH and 16% for in situ or invasive carcinoma, compared with 68%, 18% and 14% (including LCIS), respectively, in this study. Lower, but comparable, results have been shown in a retrospective analysis of 175 patients with screen-detected radial scars, 11 showing concurrent carcinoma in 3% and carcinoma in situ in 5% (5% and 7%, respectively, in this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, because no absolute mammographic criteria can be used to distinguish a RS or complex sclerosing lesion with associated benign epithelial proliferations from one containing carcinoma, 7,31-35 current practice supports performance of multiple stereotactic core needle biopsies 36,37 to fully evaluate lesions that are radiographically consistent with RS or complex sclerosing lesions. [2][3][4] Only in cases in which atypia is absent and there is good mammographic-pathologic correlation can an excisional biopsy be foregone. 37 If atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ is present, then the treatment and prognostic implications of these particular lesions should apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When such lesions are greater than 1.0 cm in size, they have been termed "complex sclerosing lesions." 2,5 The finding of carci-noma in some RS, 6 -8 especially tubular carcinomas, also has been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patterson y cols 17 en lesiones catalogadas como cicatriz radiada observaron carcinoma in situ en 16,9% en los casos sintomáticos y en 4,7% de los casos detectados por tamizaje mamográfico. Producto del mayor riesgo de asociación de cicatriz radiada con cáncer, algunos autores recomiendan la extirpación completa de las lesiones 18 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified