2015
DOI: 10.1177/1024258915585947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All roads lead to decentralization? Collective bargaining trends and prospects in Central and Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, by the end of the decade the institutions of collective bargaining resemble a devastated landscape. The most spectacular negative developments have been the rapid demise of social partnership institutions in Romania, and their gradual but steady erosion in Slovenia and Hungary (Trif, 2013; Stanojevic and Klaric, 2013; Bernaciak, 2015). The driving forces of backsliding differed in the three cases.…”
Section: Industrial Democracy: Hollowing and Backslidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, by the end of the decade the institutions of collective bargaining resemble a devastated landscape. The most spectacular negative developments have been the rapid demise of social partnership institutions in Romania, and their gradual but steady erosion in Slovenia and Hungary (Trif, 2013; Stanojevic and Klaric, 2013; Bernaciak, 2015). The driving forces of backsliding differed in the three cases.…”
Section: Industrial Democracy: Hollowing and Backslidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three developments contributed to a decline in the diversity of Central and Eastern European industrial relations systems, giving way to decentralization and fragmentation in the majority of cases. The remaining instances of collective bargaining tend to share a defensive character in that the dominant deal appears to be keeping core workers in employment at the price of wage freezes or cuts and worsening work conditions, while the precariat must face the threat of lay-off (Bernaciak, 2015).…”
Section: Industrial Democracy: Hollowing and Backslidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such episodes of contention rarely lead to larger-scale union mobilisation, they still call for a more nuanced analysis of labour strength and signal that local and plant levels are a crucial arena for labour agency. The ongoing decentralisation and hollowing out of industrial relations institutions make plant bargaining even more important in determining employment relations and working conditions (Adăscăliţei and Guga, 2017; Bernaciak, 2015; Bohle and Greskovits, 2006; Drahokoupil et al, 2015; Glassner, 2013; Meardi, 2002; Varga, 2013). By focusing primarily on labour weakness at national level, indeed, we conflate workers and trade unions and risk inferring a generalised workers’ acquiescence from unions’ marginality at the national level.…”
Section: Post-socialist Labour: Between National Weakness and Local Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in Western Europe manufacturing industries have historically provided fertile grounds for the rise of industrial unions and employers' associations that would support centralized and/or coordinated collective bargaining (Thelen, ), the FDI‐led reindustrialization of CEE economies did not stimulate the development of similar organized interests and did not stop trade union density from declining dramatically in the 2000s. With “corporatist” Slovenia constituting an exception, collective bargaining—that can be instrumental in the expansion of OPs—is largely decentralized and uncoordinated in the “neo‐liberal” Baltic and south‐eastern European states and in the “embedded neoliberal” Visegràd countries (Bernaciak, ; Bohle & Greskovits, ).…”
Section: Organized Interests and The Political Economy Of Pension Primentioning
confidence: 99%