‘All things are in flux’: China in global science

Abstract

Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China’s science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear.

Individual and collective outcomes of higher education: a comparison of Anglo-American and Chinese approaches

“…After 1978 the party-state built from almost nothing a tertiary education system housing 50% of the school leaver age cohort (UNESCO 2020) and the largest science output in the world (Li 2015;Marginson 2021). In this process, Leninist centralism combined Western modernisation with Chinese tradition.…”

“…By 'system' is simply meant a set of elements that form an interactive whole within defined boundaries. The contribution of higher education to the 'economy' is one case, though the global science system (Marginson 2021) is a more clear-cut example. However, the singular aspect of systems such as the economy or science is only one of their aspects, hence the use of brackets.…”

Analysis of Influence Factors on the Quality of International Collaboration Research in the Field of Social Sciences and Humanities: The Case of Chinese World Class Universities (2015–2019)

“…During the period, China's gross enrollment rate of higher education has exceeded 50% and entered the era of popularization. The rise of China has attracted many researchers' attention and they point out that the development of their science technology is breaking the monopoly of the European and American scientific system, which makes international science development goes into a more complex, polycentric global order (Marginson, 2021).…”

Evolution and Features of China’s Central Government Funding System for Basic Research

“…China, now a major performer in the global research system, has made great achievements in levelling up its research capacity over the past few decades ( Marginson, 2021 ). This has been evidenced in its rapidly increasing investment in R&D, the great expansion in the numbers of research personnel and publications.…”