2018
DOI: 10.1057/s41293-018-0088-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All things to all people? Discursive patterns on UK–EU relationship in David Cameron’s speeches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prime minister repeatedly emphasised that he had no ‘romantic attachment to the European Union and its institutions’ (Kroll and Leuffen, 2016: 1311) and that the United Kingdom would ‘remain in the European Union so long as it is in our interest to do so’ (Copsey and Haughton, 2014: 81), making it clear the United Kingdom would walk away if the EU’s offer was deemed insubstantial (Kroll and Leuffen, 2016: 1312). Comparative research on Cameron has found he was more Eurosceptic in the run-up to the renegotiation than otherwise, suggesting the prime minister undertook deliberate efforts to shape the discursive milieu (Brusenbauch Meislová, 2019a: 229–232; Seldon and Snowdon, 2016: 270). Fostering this discourse no doubt helped reinforce the message Cameron wished to convey to the EU, but such public statements also function as a form of ‘audience costs’, a tried-and-tested tactic through which leaders can raise the domestic costs of defecting from a position and thereby make their demands more credible (e.g.…”
Section: David Cameron’s Renegotiation and Referendummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prime minister repeatedly emphasised that he had no ‘romantic attachment to the European Union and its institutions’ (Kroll and Leuffen, 2016: 1311) and that the United Kingdom would ‘remain in the European Union so long as it is in our interest to do so’ (Copsey and Haughton, 2014: 81), making it clear the United Kingdom would walk away if the EU’s offer was deemed insubstantial (Kroll and Leuffen, 2016: 1312). Comparative research on Cameron has found he was more Eurosceptic in the run-up to the renegotiation than otherwise, suggesting the prime minister undertook deliberate efforts to shape the discursive milieu (Brusenbauch Meislová, 2019a: 229–232; Seldon and Snowdon, 2016: 270). Fostering this discourse no doubt helped reinforce the message Cameron wished to convey to the EU, but such public statements also function as a form of ‘audience costs’, a tried-and-tested tactic through which leaders can raise the domestic costs of defecting from a position and thereby make their demands more credible (e.g.…”
Section: David Cameron’s Renegotiation and Referendummentioning
confidence: 99%