1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01613145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All unitary ray representations of the conformal group SU(2,2) with positive energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
506
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 524 publications
(513 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
506
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate that, for spinning primary operators in very chiral representations of the Lorentz group, there are universal lower bounds on scaling dimensions that are strictly stronger than those implied by the more elementary unitarity bounds of [2,3]. Based on our calculations we conjecture general formulas for these new bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We demonstrate that, for spinning primary operators in very chiral representations of the Lorentz group, there are universal lower bounds on scaling dimensions that are strictly stronger than those implied by the more elementary unitarity bounds of [2,3]. Based on our calculations we conjecture general formulas for these new bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…a representation of the Lorentz group. In four-dimensional CFTs (which are our focus here) we specify the spin of an operator h by its transformation properties under su(2) ⊕ su (2). This is a pair of integers (k,k) specifying the number of chiral and antichiral spinor indices carried by the operator h = h (α 1 α 2 ···α k ),( .…”
Section: Conformal Field Theories and The Unitarity Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, repeated lowering of scale dimension must stop at some point because there is a lower bound on how small scaling dimensions can be in a unitary CFT, known as the "unitarity bound" [25], which depends on the Lorentz representation of the scaling operator. Here, we settle for a crude argument, based on scale symmetry, for why scale dimensions are bounded below.…”
Section: Lightning Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%