2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ubmk.2017.8093442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-words word sense disambiguation for Turkish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Açıkgöz et al [3] studied on semantic ambiguity for Turkish language and aimed to measure the effect of the performance of the given features for different classification algorithms. A randomly obtained dataset from Penn Treebag Corpus was translated into Turkish, and there were 1400 sentences in the translated dataset.…”
Section: Related Work About Word Sense Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Açıkgöz et al [3] studied on semantic ambiguity for Turkish language and aimed to measure the effect of the performance of the given features for different classification algorithms. A randomly obtained dataset from Penn Treebag Corpus was translated into Turkish, and there were 1400 sentences in the translated dataset.…”
Section: Related Work About Word Sense Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the studies on WSD problem were mostly done in English, we conducted this study for Turkish language, which is harder to study due to the complexity of Turkish morphology, syntactic structure, and being an agglutinative language. In the literature, there are some studies on WSD for Turkish language, for example: Açıkgöz et al [3] studied on semantic ambiguity for Turkish language and measured the performance of the given features for different classification algorithms. Orhan and Altan [4], conducted experiments to find effective features to eliminate the ambiguity of meaning in Turkish verbs and summarized the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%