2017
DOI: 10.1159/000484380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allele Drop Out Conferred by a Frequent CYP2D6 Genetic Variation For Commonly Used CYP2D6*3 Genotyping Assays

Abstract: Background/Aim: Accurate genotyping of CYP2D6 is challenging due to its inherent genetic variation, copy number variation (duplications and deletions) and hybrid formation with highly homologous pseudogenes. Because a relatively high percentage (∼25%) of clinically prescribed drugs are substrates for this enzyme, accurate determination of its genotype for phenotype prediction is essential. Methods: A cohort of 365 patient samples was genotyped for CYP2D6 using Sanger sequencing (as the gold standard), hydrolys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the other eight samples, misclassification due to allele dropout was the most probable cause of the discrepancies. In this study, a frequency of 0.01% of misclassification was shown, whereas previous publications show higher frequencies of misclassification (0.27% in 365 patients, Scantamburlo et al [29] and 0.44% in 30.769 genotypes, Blais et al [24]). A difference in discrepant results between the two genotyping centres was identified and might be explained by the different genotyping techniques used in each centre, as the call rate and accuracy of the techniques can be different.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…For the other eight samples, misclassification due to allele dropout was the most probable cause of the discrepancies. In this study, a frequency of 0.01% of misclassification was shown, whereas previous publications show higher frequencies of misclassification (0.27% in 365 patients, Scantamburlo et al [29] and 0.44% in 30.769 genotypes, Blais et al [24]). A difference in discrepant results between the two genotyping centres was identified and might be explained by the different genotyping techniques used in each centre, as the call rate and accuracy of the techniques can be different.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Another limitation is that we inferred CYP2D6 metabolizer status from the CYP2D6 genotype. There has been a series of publications describing situations where the commercially available TaqMan assays, also used here in the OpenArray format, have not worked as expected and have been redesigned (2629). Most significantly, one assay variant detecting CYP single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (*15 allele; C_32407245_40) suffers from interference from the sequence of the pseudogene CYP2D7 to the extent that these results were not included in the analysis (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched in PubMed and Google Scholar from 1996 to 2017 using the combination of keywords such as CYP2D6 , allele, and frequency plus the name of each country in the Middle East region. All studies reported CYP2D6 allele and genotype frequencies in different Middle Eastern countries including Saudi Arabia,[1314] Egypt,[15161718192021] United Arab Emirates (UAE),[2223] Iran,[24252627] Jordan,[28] Syria,[29] and Turkey[30313233343536373839404142434445] performed on healthy unrelated controls or patient samples were reviewed in this article. Overview of the studies evaluated in this review is listed in Table 1, showing the number of studies in each geographic region, number and type of samples (healthy or patients), list of alleles considered, and their frequency in each study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%