2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allele frequency distribution of CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 polymorphisms in six Mexican populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous reports, this indicates a prevalent phenotype (≥ 92%) of CYP2C9 extensive metabolizers among these four native populations (Castelan-Martinez et al, 2013). Homozygous alleles for CYP2C9 nonfunctional alleles, *2, *3, *4, and *5, were absent in natives, and only 3% were heterozygous for a variant allele (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to previous reports, this indicates a prevalent phenotype (≥ 92%) of CYP2C9 extensive metabolizers among these four native populations (Castelan-Martinez et al, 2013). Homozygous alleles for CYP2C9 nonfunctional alleles, *2, *3, *4, and *5, were absent in natives, and only 3% were heterozygous for a variant allele (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In support, frequency differences among populations indicate that Native Mexicans have a CYP2C9 genotype frequency similar to that of Asians, while Mestizos frequencies are closer to those of Caucasian descent (Castelan-Martinez et al, 2013;Scott et al, 2010;Aguilar et al, 2008;Dorado et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[29][30][31][32] In both our patient and volunteer MM samples, we observed a predominance of the wild-type CYP2C19*1 allele, a low frequency of CYP2C19*2 and an absence of CYP2C19*3 allele, as it has been previously reported. [33][34][35][36][37][38] The frequency of CYP2C19*17 allele found in the present study (MM from Central Mexico) shows a minor nonsignificant difference from that found in a recent report in MM from the state of Jalisco (0.09 and 0.14, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%