Allelochemics: Chemical Interactions between Species

Whittaker, R. H.; Feeny, Paul

doi:10.1126/science.171.3973.757

Cited by 1,098 publications

(445 citation statements)

References 221 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

396

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These include the alkaloids, glycosides, tannins, flavenoids, terpenoids, essential oils, and saponins, to name a ew (Fraenkel 1969, Whittaker andFeeny 1971 Thorsteinson (96o), Ehrlich and Raven (965), Jermy (966), Whittaker and Feeny (97), and Erickson and Feeny (973). Much (Feeny 968,969,97o (Cody 1966).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparative Utilization of Cultivated and Weedy Umbellifer Species by Larvae of the BlackSwallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Polyxenes

Erickson

1975

Psyche: A Journal of Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparative Utilization of Cultivated and Weedy Umbellifer Species by Larvae of the BlackSwallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Polyxenes

Erickson

1975

Psyche: A Journal of Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Várias substâncias químicas relacionadas com alelopatia têm sido descritas em detalhes por autores como Rice (1984) e Putnam & Tang (1986). Whittaker & Feeny (1971) classificaram esses produtos secundários em cinco categorias principais: terpenóides, esteróides, alcalóides, acetogeninas e fenilpropanóides. Rice (1984) apresentou um classificação mais ampla desses compostos, envolvendo quinonas, taninos, flavonóides e outros.…”

Section: Malícia Malvaunclassified

Potencial alelopático de plantas de acapu (Vouacapoua americana): efeitos sobre plantas daninhas de pastagens

Filho

Alves

2000

Planta daninha

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The idea that plant chemicals may serve as defenses against herbivores and pathogens is a paradigm dating back at least half a century (Fraenkel, 1959 ;Whittaker & Feeny, 1971 ;Levin, 1976). A wealth of literature exists in this area.…”

Section: Research On Plant Defensesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metal hyperaccumulation: a model system for coevolutionary studies

Pollard

2000

New Phytologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent years have seen a flurry of research activity concerning the hyperaccumulation of heavy metals by plants. Much of the interest in hyperaccumulation has been fueled by the commercial potential of phytoremediation, the use of plants to clean up contaminated soils (Baker et al., 1994; Salt et al., 1995; Chaney et al., 1997, 2000). These applications have in turn spurred many studies of the genetics and physiology of metal uptake (e.g. Krämer et al., 1996; Lasat et al., 1996; Salt & Krämer, 1999; Baker et al., 2000; see also Krämer, 2000; Lombi et al., 2000). Although phytoremediation provides an intriguing and potentially profitable backdrop, the ecology and evolution of hyperaccumulation in natural populations are interesting subjects in their own right. Two papers in this issue (Ghaderian et al., pp. 219–224; Davis & Boyd, pp. 211–217) are exciting contributions to the growing consensus that hyperaccumulation may act as a defense against herbivores and pathogens, and suggest that hyperaccumulation may become a model system for research in this area.

show abstract

Allelochemics: Chemical Interactions between Species

Cited by 1,098 publications

References 221 publications

The Comparative Utilization of Cultivated and Weedy Umbellifer Species by Larvae of the BlackSwallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Polyxenes

The Comparative Utilization of Cultivated and Weedy Umbellifer Species by Larvae of the BlackSwallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Polyxenes

Potencial alelopático de plantas de acapu (Vouacapoua americana): efeitos sobre plantas daninhas de pastagens

Metal hyperaccumulation: a model system for coevolutionary studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About