2020
DOI: 10.1111/pde.14084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by wound closure tape in a pediatric patient

Abstract: Wound care products are emerging as causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). There are increasing reports of ACD to certain medical adhesives; however, there are no published reports of contact sensitization solely due to wound closure tape such as Steri‐Strips™. Herein, we present the first confirmed case of ACD in a child caused by wound closure tape.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[128][129][130][131] This allergen is often found in the adhesive portion of insulin pumps and glucose sensors. 132 In patients with diabetes referred for patch testing because of suspected ACD to Freestyle Libre (Abbott, Chicago, Illinois), 81% of patients had a PPT to IBOA. 133 IBOA was the ACDS Allergen of the Year in 2020.…”
Section: Emerging Pediatric Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[128][129][130][131] This allergen is often found in the adhesive portion of insulin pumps and glucose sensors. 132 In patients with diabetes referred for patch testing because of suspected ACD to Freestyle Libre (Abbott, Chicago, Illinois), 81% of patients had a PPT to IBOA. 133 IBOA was the ACDS Allergen of the Year in 2020.…”
Section: Emerging Pediatric Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was identified in a wound closure tape, probably Steristrip, 2 there have also been one more publication with an allergic reaction to this product, but no allergen was identified in the tape. 13 The patient that reacted to the EMLA local anaesthetic patch had a three-plus reaction to the patch when tested as is. However, this patient was also positive to prilocaine, the active substance in the EMLA patch, with + reaction to prilocaine 5% pet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, no patch testing with 4,4′‐thiobis(2‐tert‐butyl‐5‐methylphenol) was performed, but it may also be a possible cause of dermatitis. Except for the report where 4,4′‐thiobis(2‐tert‐butyl‐5‐methylphenol) was identified in a wound closure tape, probably Steristrip, 2 there have also been one more publication with an allergic reaction to this product, but no allergen was identified in the tape 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Periwound skin changes are a significant quality-of-life issue for patients, 5 and unrecognized and untreated periwound dermatitis slows wound healing. 6 Correct and timely recognition and treatment of the causes of periwound dermatitis are an essential skill for wound clinicians, requiring an understanding of the normal function of the skin as a barrier and the reaction patterns produced when the skin barrier fails. 7 In this article, the author outlines the recognition and differential diagnosis of ACD, discusses the role of the skin barrier function, lists the most common sources of allergenic substances associated with ACD, and offers an algorithm for patients who present with dermatitis and a history of LLUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of developing allergic CD (ACD) increases with the duration of venous leg disease and the incidence of sensitization overall; it is more prevalent in patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) 3,4 . Periwound skin changes are a significant quality-of-life issue for patients, 5 and unrecognized and untreated periwound dermatitis slows wound healing 6 . Correct and timely recognition and treatment of the causes of periwound dermatitis are an essential skill for wound clinicians, requiring an understanding of the normal function of the skin as a barrier and the reaction patterns produced when the skin barrier fails 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%