2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62701-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleviation of migraine symptoms by application of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to myofascial trigger points of neck and shoulder muscles – A randomized trial

Abstract: Migraine is a burdensome disease with an especially high prevalence in women between the age of 15 and 49 years. Non-pharmacological, non-invasive therapeutic methods to control symptoms are increasingly in demand to complement a multimodal intervention approach in migraine. Thirty-seven subjects (age: 25.0 ± 4.1 years; 36 females) diagnosed with high-frequency episodic migraine who presented at least one active myofascial trigger point (mTrP) in the trapezius muscles and at least one latent mTrP in the deltoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study tested repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to myofascial trigger points of the neck compared to shoulder-muscle stimulation [ 37 ]. As such peripheral magnetic stimulation has an impact on peripheral nerves, it was included in this systematic review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study tested repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to myofascial trigger points of the neck compared to shoulder-muscle stimulation [ 37 ]. As such peripheral magnetic stimulation has an impact on peripheral nerves, it was included in this systematic review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study used peripheral pulsed electromagnetic fields applied to the wrist and was negative [ 45 ]. Another study tested repetitive magnetic stimulation to myofascial trigger points of the neck compared to shoulder muscle stimulation [ 46 ]. There was no difference between the two stimulation sites, although a reduction relative to baseline was seen in both groups.…”
Section: Neurostimulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, elevated T2 values may serve as future response predictors for such therapies on the long run. Vice versa, CGRP levels may serve as markers for prediction or assessment of treatment responses of approaches focusing on the neck and shoulder muscles, such as repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) ( 37 39 ). Yet, another interesting perspective may be to assess the effects of CGRP-targeting medications applied subcutaneously in the neck and shoulder region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%