2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: Testing a model on manufacturing firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The research of a second group of authors is focused on the relationship between strategic alliance characteristics and profitability (Zollo, Reuer and Singh, 2002;Lu and Beamish, 2006). Finally, the largest number of studies aim to answer which strategic alliance characteristics affect the profitability of the alliance members and in what way (Bae and Gargiulo, 2004;Lee, 2007;Goerzen, 2007;Luo, Rindfleisch and Tse, 2007;Antoncic and Prodan, 2008;Lin, Yang and Arya, 2009). While revealing a substantial amount of information about the impact of strategic alliances on firm performance, existing studies are mostly based on simple analytical methods that question the validity of their findings.…”
Section: Nikola Butigan and đUro Benićmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research of a second group of authors is focused on the relationship between strategic alliance characteristics and profitability (Zollo, Reuer and Singh, 2002;Lu and Beamish, 2006). Finally, the largest number of studies aim to answer which strategic alliance characteristics affect the profitability of the alliance members and in what way (Bae and Gargiulo, 2004;Lee, 2007;Goerzen, 2007;Luo, Rindfleisch and Tse, 2007;Antoncic and Prodan, 2008;Lin, Yang and Arya, 2009). While revealing a substantial amount of information about the impact of strategic alliances on firm performance, existing studies are mostly based on simple analytical methods that question the validity of their findings.…”
Section: Nikola Butigan and đUro Benićmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these studies as the basis, we measured EP using two items: environmental certifications and self-evaluation of EP over the past 5 years. Similarly, based on the previous studies (Darnall et al 2008;Tanriverdi and Lee 2008;Antoncic and Prodan 2008), FP has also been measured by self-evaluated measures of sales growth and improvement in market share. We prefer to call this construct as FP rather than financial performance because these are selfevaluated items using a Likert scale rather than objective financial measures (such as return on assets).…”
Section: Measures and Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firm performance (Darnall et al 2008;Tanriverdi and Lee 2008;Antoncic and Prodan 2008) On an average, sales have been growing over the last 5 years 0.957 92 % 0.957 0.000…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth was measured as the average annual growth of total assets in the period between 2003 and 2006 and as the average annual growth of the sales income in the same period (Antončič & Prodan, 2008).…”
Section: Operationalization and Measure Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%