2015
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allo-SCT for myelofibrosis: reversing the chronic phase in the JAK inhibitor era?

Abstract: At present, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Unfortunately a significant proportion of candidate patients are considered transplant ineligible due to their poor general condition and advanced age at time of diagnosis. The approval of the first JAK inhibitor, Ruxolitinib, for patients with advanced MF in 2011 has had a qualified impact on the treatment algorithm. The drug affords substantial improvement in MF-assoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we review the impact of pre‐ASCT ruxolitinib on the outcome of ASCT in myelofibrosis patients. There have been conflicting reports on the safety and impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor treatment before ASCT . We did not observe any withdrawal syndrome in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we review the impact of pre‐ASCT ruxolitinib on the outcome of ASCT in myelofibrosis patients. There have been conflicting reports on the safety and impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor treatment before ASCT . We did not observe any withdrawal syndrome in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…There have been conflicting reports on the safety and impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor treatment before ASCT. 12,14,16,18,24 We did not observe any withdrawal syndrome in our cohort. The first prospective study evaluating the use of ruxolitinib prior to ASCT was by multicenter one developed cardiogenic shock, resulting in discontinuation of study enrollment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…913 Theoretically, JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy may help in overcoming some of these barriers. 7,14,15 Its potential benefits in this setting include:(a) reduction in splenomegaly, which may facilitate engraftment, (b) decreasing symptoms due to pro-inflammatory cytokines, (c) improvement in performance status prior to HCT, (d) and a possible beneficial effect on GVHD. 16 However, conflicting data have emerged in the last two years on the safety of JAK1/2 inhibitors prior to HCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, drugs targeting the driver mutations displayed by the malignant hematopoietic stem clones, such as the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, are greatly effective in ameliorating the clinical manifestation of the disease but it is still unclear whether they are also effective in halting the progression toward its final stage ( Mascarenhas and Hoffman, 2013 ; Tefferi, 2021 ). As of today, with exception of bone marrow transplantation which may be offered to a limited number of patients ( Tamari et al, 2015 ), this disease is still an unmet clinical need. Based on the observation that bone marrow transplantation cures the disease by rescuing both the hematopoietic stem cell and the microenvironmental abnormalities displayed by the patient, the consensus has been reached that treatment of the disease requires the use of drug combinations targeting both abnormalities ( Eran et al, 2019 ; Tefferi, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%