2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allocation of flows in closed bipartite queueing networks

Abstract: This paper describes a novel method for allocating agents to routes in a closed bipartite queueing network to maximize system throughput using three open network approximations. Results are presented which compare this method with known prior work and optimal solutions to provide an empirical optimality gap. Average empirical optimality gaps of 1.29%, 1.13% and 1.29% are observed for the three approximations considered. Further, because many systems are under the control of rational agents, conditions are deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent predisaster studies, for instance, have developed models for resources preparation (Chang et al., ), debris prediction (Hsu et al., ; Miao and Ding, ), and prepositioning of supplies (Rawls and Turnquist, ). Previous studies have investigated routing assessment (Hobeika et al., ; Huang et al., ; Brooks et al., ), rescue team deployment (Zverovich et al., ), evacuation planning (Guo et al., ; Zverovich et al., ), ambulance and resources distribution (Sheu, ; Fetter and Rakes, ; Özdamar and Demir, ), relief demand management (Sheu, ), and human behaviors (Nejat and Damnjanovic, ) in postdisaster scenarios. In contrast to these studies, relatively fewer studies have been conducted on debris removal operations despite the fact that debris disposal accounts typically for nearly one‐third of the total recovery cost in natural disasters.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent predisaster studies, for instance, have developed models for resources preparation (Chang et al., ), debris prediction (Hsu et al., ; Miao and Ding, ), and prepositioning of supplies (Rawls and Turnquist, ). Previous studies have investigated routing assessment (Hobeika et al., ; Huang et al., ; Brooks et al., ), rescue team deployment (Zverovich et al., ), evacuation planning (Guo et al., ; Zverovich et al., ), ambulance and resources distribution (Sheu, ; Fetter and Rakes, ; Özdamar and Demir, ), relief demand management (Sheu, ), and human behaviors (Nejat and Damnjanovic, ) in postdisaster scenarios. In contrast to these studies, relatively fewer studies have been conducted on debris removal operations despite the fact that debris disposal accounts typically for nearly one‐third of the total recovery cost in natural disasters.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planning linked to optimization methods has been used in recent years, as observed in works involving vehicle routing (Cuda et al 2015, Prodhon & Prins 2014, Koç & Karaoglan 2016, Li et al 2015, log transportation (Borges et al , Bordón et al 2018, queuing problem (Jain et al 2012, Chun & Mitra 2014, Brooks et al 2016, pattern recognition (Antonova 2011, Macas et al 2014 and scheduling problem (Ramage et al 2013, Giménez et al 2013, Diaz-Balteiro et al 2009, Diaz-Balteiro & Rodriguez 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%