2019
DOI: 10.1111/tri.13492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allograft outcome following repeat transplantation of patients with non‐adherence‐related first kidney allograft failure: a population cohort study

Abstract: Nonadherence is an important risk factor for premature allograft failure after kidney transplantation, but outcomes after re-transplantation remain uncertain. Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry, the associations between causes of first allograft failure and acute rejection-related and non-adherence-related allograft failure following re-transplantation were examined using competing risk analyses, treating the respective alternative causes of allograft failure and de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to many missing data on variables related to nonadherence, we were unable to examine the effect of nonadherence directly. Instead, we examined the association of age with time to second transplantation because patients who lost their graft from nonadherence may have a longer waiting time [22]. The result was similar to the association between age and graft failure risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to many missing data on variables related to nonadherence, we were unable to examine the effect of nonadherence directly. Instead, we examined the association of age with time to second transplantation because patients who lost their graft from nonadherence may have a longer waiting time [22]. The result was similar to the association between age and graft failure risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 20 960 patients, 3850 (18%) patients received kidney transplants twice or more and up to five times 1638 (8) 1670 (8) 2185 102321 (11) 3778 (18) 3522 172858 (14) 2988 (14) Male (19) 186 (11) 270 (16) 375 (17) 425 (18) 720 (19) 743 (21) 609 (21) 566 (19) Other 2215 (11) 171 (10) 206 (12) 238 (11) 273 (12) 411 (11) 374 (11) 288 (10) 254 (9) Hispanic (%) 4728 (23) 287 (18) 381 (23) 478 (22) 551 (24) 915 (24) 855 (24) 636 (22) 625 (21) Medicaid (%) 140 (6) 212 9445 (12) 523 (15) 543 (19) 728 (24) FSGS 2523 1225 (2) 129 (8) 274 (13) 267 (12) 479 (13) 495 (14) 447 (16)…”
Section: Patients Characteristics and Crude Graft Failure Mortality mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posttransplantation events in patients with a previously failed allograft can be instructive about previous rejection episodes (eg, early versus late), reason(s) of graft loss, development of DSA, graft survival time and tolerance of immunosuppressive medication including how the patients "felt, functioned and survived" (ie, patient reported outcomes). 1 A socioeconomical, cultural, educational, motivational and emotional assessment can detect potential barriers to adherence (eg, educational level, self-efficacy, financial barriers).…”
Section: Tools To Identify Medication Nonadherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MNA has been associated with graft loss, (sub)clinical (late) acute T-cell-mediated rejection, allograft dysfunction, formation of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) and humoral rejection and potentially as well with opportunistic infections like polyomavirusassociated nephropathy (PVAN). [1][2][3][4][5][6] Because MNA after SOT originates from a very diverse conglomerate of partially dynamic causes and is predominantly unintentional, simple or generic solutions are not available and therapeutic interventions require a persistent holistic individualized patient approach and a multidisciplinary support team. 7 The distinction between intentional and nonintentional MNA is not always easy because often subconscious psychological processes are involved in so-called unintentional nonadherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current issue of Transplant International, Manickavasagar et al . reported on a longitudinal cohort of kidney transplant recipients using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) who had graft failure and received a second kidney transplant . This well‐designed study allowed the authors to evaluate the risk of NA‐related second allograft failure in patients with prior graft loss because of documented nonadherence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%