1988
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.70b3.3286656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery

Abstract: The results of a study of the use of autograft versus allograft bone in the surgery of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors reported significant lower blood loss and reduced operative time using synthetic bone graft substitutes or allograft instead of ICBG [3,12,17]. Compared to the ICBG group, operative time in the b-TCP group was slightly reduced by 10 min though not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of authors reported significant lower blood loss and reduced operative time using synthetic bone graft substitutes or allograft instead of ICBG [3,12,17]. Compared to the ICBG group, operative time in the b-TCP group was slightly reduced by 10 min though not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a number of authors advocate allograft augmentation to achieve successful spinal fusion, reporting comparable results to the use of autograft [3,6,12,14,17,20]. Concerns, however, exist regarding the efficacy of frozen or freeze dried allograft, the potential of immunogenicity, and the hazard of microbial contamination, though the rate of disease transmission has proven to be low [1,13,24,26,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no studies which demonstrate superiority of one graft material over another. The uncontrolled studies of Dodd et al [48] and Ilharreborde et al [49] support the recommendation that autologous ICBG is no longer the routinely used graft for spine fusion in AIS patients. There is no evidence which evaluates the effectiveness of BMP use in AIS patients, yet there is evidence to indicate its use in pediatric spinal fusions is increasing [50].…”
Section: Supporting Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 92%
“…9 Allogeneic bone graft is usually the 2nd choice for clinical bone replacement. 10 The off-the-shelf availability and lack of donor site morbidity are undisputed advantages of the allograft. 11,12 Fresh, frozen, and freeze-dried allografts are seemed to be the most popular, however, there is not a well-established protocol for their manufacture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%