Splenectomy is an old weapon in the armamentarium for treating patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia major (TM). The chief therapeutic justification for splenectomy in TM is to reduce transfusion requirement and thereby decrease iron overload [1]. It is important to recognize the underlying cause for hypersplenism, splenomegaly and resultant increased transfusion requirement. In majority of patients, it is the result of an inadequate or suboptimal transfusion regimen. In order to suppress extra-medullary erythropoiesis, the pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) is to be maintained above 9-10.5 g/dl [2,3]. Maintenance of a lower Hb over an extended period of time promotes splenomegaly, resultant hypersplenism, and eventually a further drop in Hb. Consequently, a vicious cycle of low Hb and increased transfusion requirement is created. Splenomegaly, due to periods of under-transfusion may be reversible. Before proceeding for splenectomy in this condition, the patient should be placed on an adequate transfusion program for several months and then re-evaluated [4]. In developing countries, patients with TM are often transfused blood periodically at suboptimal Hb levels -often when the patient is symptomatic. Several factors are contributory, including, restricted blood supply, limited thalassemia day-care-units, lack of financial/medical resources and lack of awareness. In addition, fear of increasing iron load, inconvenience, distance and loss of employment of care-taker contribute. The typical patient with TM who is considered for splenectomy in author's practice is often from a low socio-economic background, has been sub-optimally transfused, often inadequately chelated for several years and visits the tertiary care center for opinion. Over the last several decades, with adequate pre-transfusional Hb levels and more correct intervals between transfusions, the need for splenectomy in TM patients has reduced [5].Major adverse effects of splenectomy are sepsis, thrombophilia, pulmonary hypertension and iron overload [4]. The risk of mortality from febrile illnesses remains, and prompt assessment of febrile episode is vital. Splenectomy leaves patients more susceptible to malaria [6]. An experience with splenectomy in 26 children with hereditary spherocytosis has been reported from author's center. Two (7.7 %) children developed postsplenectomy sepsis over a median duration of follow up of 4.5 y [7]. In clinical practice, an argument often offered in favor of splenectomy is a reduction in iron overload secondary to reduced transfusions. It is often not recognized that following splenectomy, the total body iron storage capacity is reduced. Iron is redirected and accumulated in the liver, heart, and other organs and unless chelation is aggressive, the iron concentration in these organs increases [4,8]. Nevertheless, when annual transfusion requirement rises above 200 ml/kg/y of pure red cells, splenectomy is one of several strategies to reduce the rate of iron-loading [2]. Splenectomy leads to a higher prevalence ...