1976
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(76)90077-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometric analysis of organ weights: II. Beagle dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that this cusp often reveals a remarkable thickening and opacity even in young dogs together with a unique histological structure (5, 6. The expected heart weights in this series (= y) were almost identical with those (= x) found previously by Li~tzen et al (8). Moreover, this part seems to be very vulnerable and is often subject to pathological stress manifestations (15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that this cusp often reveals a remarkable thickening and opacity even in young dogs together with a unique histological structure (5, 6. The expected heart weights in this series (= y) were almost identical with those (= x) found previously by Li~tzen et al (8). Moreover, this part seems to be very vulnerable and is often subject to pathological stress manifestations (15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In dogs, the allometric growth constant (b) of these two valvular parts in relation to body weight lies between 0.80 and 0.86 and is therefore comparable with the growth rate of lung or liver, for example (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The third argument consistent with a cranial shift in support roles is that puppies have a relatively voluminous belly and a cylindrical trunk compared to the conical trunk form that adult dogs show. Abdominal organs such as spleen or kidneys show negative allometry, while the heart (Lützen et al, ; but see Deavers et al, ) and the stomach exhibit positive allometry in various mammals (guinea pig: Bessesen and Carlson, ; dog: Deavers et al, ; Lützen et al, ; rat: Stewart and German, ). Furthermore, to fuel ontogenetic growth and provide the developing body with the tissue necessary for digestion and absorption of high dietary loads, the small intestine is relatively larger in juveniles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 With the possible exception of Beagles, 4,24 adoption of these practices for dogs is problematic, given the limited amount of published information available on canine morphometrics, growth, and organ weights 13 and the profound effect that breed, sex, and age have on these parameters. 16,40 In our population, death due to emaciation in dogs <6 months of age was uncommon (1 in 33 dogs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%