2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1314-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometric biomass, nutrient and carbon stock models for Kandelia candel of the Sundarbans, Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38.35% AE 5.82% and 44.91% AE 0.89% for 13 species). Hossain et al (2016) found a similar trend in the mangrove species Kandelia candel. However, opposite results have also been found; a lower carbon fraction in stem wood compared to stem bark in the mangrove Kandelia obovata (Khan et al 2007) and an increasing carbon fraction from pith to bark in the sugar maple (Acer saccharum; Lamlom and Savidge 2006).…”
Section: Variation In Carbon Fraction and Wood Specific Gravitysupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38.35% AE 5.82% and 44.91% AE 0.89% for 13 species). Hossain et al (2016) found a similar trend in the mangrove species Kandelia candel. However, opposite results have also been found; a lower carbon fraction in stem wood compared to stem bark in the mangrove Kandelia obovata (Khan et al 2007) and an increasing carbon fraction from pith to bark in the sugar maple (Acer saccharum; Lamlom and Savidge 2006).…”
Section: Variation In Carbon Fraction and Wood Specific Gravitysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Hossain et al. () found a similar trend in the mangrove species Kandelia candel . However, opposite results have also been found; a lower carbon fraction in stem wood compared to stem bark in the mangrove Kandelia obovata (Khan et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…An indirect approach using allometric models is the most appropriate option in biomass estimation. The allometric technique initially requires an extensive destructive sampling to establish allometric models, and the models can be used as a non-destructive method to estimate the whole or partial weight of a tree from measurable tree dimensions (e.g., stem diameter and height) [5,6]. The allometric method is so far the most widely used method today, where individual tree data are available from a forest inventory, and it is also considered the most accurate method [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the biomass might differ due to variations in topography, environmental conditions, stand age, species composition, and natural and anthropogenic disturbances, therefore, the use of generalized equations can lead to a bias in estimating biomass for a particular species [13]. To reduce this uncertainty in the estimation of biomass, it is generally best to use species-and site-specific allometric models [6,14]. However, in practical operation, species-specific allometric models may be suitable for temperate and cold regions, where relatively few tree species are found, but not suitable for tropical and subtropical forest, where hundreds of species can coexist in a given area [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allometric models depict relationship between different variables related to trees including diameter at breast height (DBH), height of the tree trunk, total height of the tree, crown diameter, height-diameter ratio (H/D), tree species richness, etc. (Hossain et al, 2016a;Islam et al, 2017). The choice of these variables varied among different studies.…”
Section: Variables Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%