2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11273-020-09772-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometric growth and carbon storage in the mangrove Sonneratia apetala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study further revealed that belowground biomass carbon density showed more significant variability between temperate desert and temperate steppe, while the trend of soil carbon density was relatively similar. This phenomenon is mainly due to the fact that belowground biomass carbon density is directly affected by the cycle of plant growth and decline [44], and its trend is thus relatively drastic. In contrast, soil carbon density reflects more complex carbon cycling processes, such as decomposition, mineralisation, and humification of organic carbon, which are usually more peaceful, thus keeping soil carbon density relatively stable.…”
Section: Soil Carbon Density In Temperate Steppe and Temperate Desert...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study further revealed that belowground biomass carbon density showed more significant variability between temperate desert and temperate steppe, while the trend of soil carbon density was relatively similar. This phenomenon is mainly due to the fact that belowground biomass carbon density is directly affected by the cycle of plant growth and decline [44], and its trend is thus relatively drastic. In contrast, soil carbon density reflects more complex carbon cycling processes, such as decomposition, mineralisation, and humification of organic carbon, which are usually more peaceful, thus keeping soil carbon density relatively stable.…”
Section: Soil Carbon Density In Temperate Steppe and Temperate Desert...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface area of S. apetala trees is estimated using the model of the "Modelling scenarios" section (shown in Fig. 5b) and their tree weight using the biomass allometric relationships of Zhu et al 79 Mangrove stability is calculated using the full range for the empirical coefficient for overturning ( C r = 60 − 200 m 2 /s 272 ), since there is no specific information of C r values for mangroves, and using the expected range of modulus of rupture for S. apetala ( σ u = 37±7 N/mm 2 ) 55 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mangrove Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forces are calculated at the edge of the forest (neglecting canopy effects), and we assume f knot = 1 in tree stability calculations. The surface area of S. apetala trees is estimated using the model of the Methods section and their tree weight using the biomass allometric relationships of Zhu et al 80 Mangrove stability is calculated using the full range for the empirical coefficient for overturning (C r = 60 − 200 m 2 /s 273 ), since there is no specific information of C r values for mangroves, and using the expected range of modulus of rupture for S. apetala (σ u = 37±7 N/mm 2 ) 37 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mangrove Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the tree weight is estimated using the allometric relationships of Zhu et al 80 and the regression constant C r is varied between C r = 60 − 200 m 2 /s 273 .…”
Section: /21mentioning
confidence: 99%