2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2010.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometric variation among juvenile, adult male and female eastern bearded dragons Pogona barbata (Cuvier, 1829), with comments on the behavioural implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual differences, most notably of secondary sexual characteristics, are a key aspect of within‐species variation impacting on anatomy, behavior, physiology, and life history (Chen, Stuart‐Fox, Hugall, & Symonds, 2012; Deepak et al 2016; Hoops et al, 2017; Littleford‐Colquhoun et al, 2019; McLean, Chan, Dickerson, Moussalli, & Stuart‐Fox, 2016; Stauber & Booth, 2003; Thompson & Withers, 2005; Wotherspoon & Burgin, 2011). Sex‐determination mechanisms in reptiles are incredibly diverse, exhibiting a rich evolutionary history of repeated independent transitions between sex‐determination modes (Alam, Sarre, Gleeson, Georges, & Ezaz, 2018; Gamble et al, 2015; Pokorna & Kratochvil, 2016; Sarre, Ezaz, & Georges, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sexual differences, most notably of secondary sexual characteristics, are a key aspect of within‐species variation impacting on anatomy, behavior, physiology, and life history (Chen, Stuart‐Fox, Hugall, & Symonds, 2012; Deepak et al 2016; Hoops et al, 2017; Littleford‐Colquhoun et al, 2019; McLean, Chan, Dickerson, Moussalli, & Stuart‐Fox, 2016; Stauber & Booth, 2003; Thompson & Withers, 2005; Wotherspoon & Burgin, 2011). Sex‐determination mechanisms in reptiles are incredibly diverse, exhibiting a rich evolutionary history of repeated independent transitions between sex‐determination modes (Alam, Sarre, Gleeson, Georges, & Ezaz, 2018; Gamble et al, 2015; Pokorna & Kratochvil, 2016; Sarre, Ezaz, & Georges, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern might indicate that males bite more forcefully and use biting to compete for access to females (Witten, 1994). Sexual dimorphism in head size (and possibly shape) may be common among agamid lizards (e.g., Hoops et al, 2017; Kuo, Lin, & Lin, 2009; Littleford‐Colquhoun et al, 2019; Stauber & Booth, 2003; Thompson & Withers, 2005; Wotherspoon & Burgin, 2011), and greater bite force associated with greater head size has been found in male eastern water dragons ( Intellagama lesueurii ; Baxter‐Gilbert & Whiting, 2019). Two species of spiny‐tailed agamid Uromastyx do not show obvious sexual differences in head dimensions or bite force but comparisons may be limited by sample size: n = 7:5 and 1:5 (Herrel, Castilla, Al‐Sulaiti, & Wessels, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%