“…Several studies observed variations in the shell thickness, shell shape, shell sculpture, growth rate, and overall development of freshwater mussels between the same species across different lake-stream habitats, such as A. anatina and U. tumidus in Lake Polvijärvi (the current study) have different shell morphology in comparison to the same species at Lake Viinijärvi (Abdelsaleheen, 2023), and National Nature Reserve, Wicken Lode, United Kingdom (Aldridge, 1999); or between different species at the same habitat, as Pyganodon grandis and Lampsilis radiata siliquoidea in USA ( Keogh et al, 2023); Anodonta cygnea, Pseudanodonta complanate, Anodonta anatina, Unio pictorum and Unio tumidus in National Nature Reserve, Wicken Lode, U. K. (Aldridge, 1999). Likewise, the b value (0.72) of the width-height relationship was higher for A. anatina, the present study, compared to previously studied mussel species, such as A. anatina, P. complanate, U. tumidus, P. corrugate, and P. favidens, and lower than A. cygnea and U. pictorum (Aldridge 1999;Ramesha & Thippeswamy, 2009;Thippeswamy et al, 2014). Similarly, U. tumidus in the present study exhibited a higher b value (0.65) compared to P. complanate, P. corrugate, and P. favidens, and lower than A. anatina, A. cygnea, U. pictorum, and U. tumidus (Aldridge, 1999;Ramesha & Thippeswamy, 2009;Thippeswamy et al, 2014).…”