Abstract:An allosteric modulator is a ligand that binds to an allosteric site on the receptor and changes receptor conformation to produce increase (positive cooperativity) or decrease (negative cooperativity) in the binding or action of an orthosteric agonist (e.g., acetylcholine). Since the identification of gallamine as the first allosteric modulator of muscarinic receptors in 1976, this unique mode of receptor modulation has been intensively studied by many groups. This review summarizes over 30 years of research o… Show more
“…First, the negative binding cooperativity between WTX and another orthosteric ligand, acetylcholine, was previously observed at M1, M2, M4, and M5 mAChRs (15). Second, it is well documented that minor changes in the structure of allosteric modulators may lead to a completely different sort of cooperativity (6). For example, the changes in mode of interaction with acetylcholine or NMS binding at different subtypes of mAChR were described for a series of strychnine and brucine analogues (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Separate groups of three-finger toxins act on numerous targets (2), including two classes of acetylcholine receptors as follows: nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) 2 belonging to ligand-gated ion channels (3) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family (4). Both types of acetylcholine receptors are responsible for cholinergic signaling in central and peripheral nervous systems and could be considered as promising targets for treatment of a number of disorders, including Alzheimer disease, schizophrenia, and Parkinson disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3,5,6).…”
Background: Cobra's "three-finger" nonconventional toxin WTX allosterically modulates muscarinic receptors (mAChRs). Results: Activity of several WTX mutants was analyzed; toxin spatial structure and dynamics were determined; and complexes of toxin with M1 and M3 mAChRs were modeled. Conclusion: Flexible loop II is the major determinant for toxin binding to different mAChRs. Significance: Structural framework for rationalization of target-specific positive/negative allosteric regulation of mAChRs is provided.
“…First, the negative binding cooperativity between WTX and another orthosteric ligand, acetylcholine, was previously observed at M1, M2, M4, and M5 mAChRs (15). Second, it is well documented that minor changes in the structure of allosteric modulators may lead to a completely different sort of cooperativity (6). For example, the changes in mode of interaction with acetylcholine or NMS binding at different subtypes of mAChR were described for a series of strychnine and brucine analogues (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Separate groups of three-finger toxins act on numerous targets (2), including two classes of acetylcholine receptors as follows: nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) 2 belonging to ligand-gated ion channels (3) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family (4). Both types of acetylcholine receptors are responsible for cholinergic signaling in central and peripheral nervous systems and could be considered as promising targets for treatment of a number of disorders, including Alzheimer disease, schizophrenia, and Parkinson disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3,5,6).…”
Background: Cobra's "three-finger" nonconventional toxin WTX allosterically modulates muscarinic receptors (mAChRs). Results: Activity of several WTX mutants was analyzed; toxin spatial structure and dynamics were determined; and complexes of toxin with M1 and M3 mAChRs were modeled. Conclusion: Flexible loop II is the major determinant for toxin binding to different mAChRs. Significance: Structural framework for rationalization of target-specific positive/negative allosteric regulation of mAChRs is provided.
“…Their function involves the increase of exocrine secretions, contraction of the cardiac and smooth muscles in the gastrointestinal tract and lung and reduction of the heart rate. They are important for learning, memory and attention mechanisms, motor control, nociception and regulation of the sleep-wake cycle (Jakubík and El-Fakahany, 2010). Muscarinic receptors belong to the family of Rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Lagerström and Schiöth, 2008).…”
Finally, I would like to thanks my family for supporting me, day-today, in all my decisions. Without you, I would have never been possible to start my career as a researcher. vi vii _____ TABLE OF CONTENTS _____
“…However, simple homology modeling is with high probability unsuitable for modeling of ligand binding that induce large conformational change (e.g. muscarinic allosteic modulators; for a review see [2]). As noted above success or failure of simple homology modeling is determined by the suitability of the template(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, intensive research in the field of muscarinic receptors has resulted in the discovery of new compounds that interact with muscarinic receptors in a novel manner [2]. Several of them exhibit unusual behaviors that do not mimic known orthosteric competitive agonists and antagonists.…”
Twelve homology models of the human M2 muscarinic receptor using different sets of templates have been designed using the Prime program or the modeller program and compared to crystallographic structure (PDB:3UON). The best models were obtained using single template of the closest published structure, the M3 muscarinic receptor (PDB:4DAJ). Adding more (structurally distant) templates led to worse models. Data document a key role of the template in homology modeling. The models differ substantially. The quality checks built into the programs do not correlate with the RMSDs to the crystallographic structure and cannot be used to select the best model. Re-docking of the antagonists present in crystallographic structure and relative binding energy estimation by calculating MM/GBSA in Prime and the binding energy function in YASARA suggested it could be possible to evaluate the quality of the orthosteric binding site based on the prediction of relative binding energies. Although estimation of relative binding energies distinguishes between relatively good and bad models it does not indicate the best one. On the other hand, visual inspection of the models for known features and knowledge-based analysis of the intramolecular interactions allows an experimenter to select overall best models manually.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.