1976
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(76)90672-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allowed partial transitions in muon capture by 28Si

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Ciechanowicz et al (1998) found the effects of soft-pion exchange were negligible. For comparison, the earlier calculations of Ciechanowicz (1976) and Parthasarathy and Sridhar (1981) gave values for g p /g a of 3.3 ± 1.0 and 1.5± 0.9 1.1 respectively.…”
Section: Recommended Values Of Gp/gamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that Ciechanowicz et al (1998) found the effects of soft-pion exchange were negligible. For comparison, the earlier calculations of Ciechanowicz (1976) and Parthasarathy and Sridhar (1981) gave values for g p /g a of 3.3 ± 1.0 and 1.5± 0.9 1.1 respectively.…”
Section: Recommended Values Of Gp/gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first efforts were made by Ciechanowicz (1976) and Sridhar (1978, 1981), but employed relatively crude nuclear wave functions, the 1p-1h wave function of Donnelly and Walker (1970) and the truncated 1s-0d wave function of McGrory and Wildenthal (1971). More recently Kuz'min and Tetereva (2000), Kuz'min et al (2001), Siiskonen et al (1999), andCiechanowicz et al (1998) have conducted full 1s-0d calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, there have been many attempts in the past to extract the ratio of the induced pseudoscalar and axial-vector coupling constants, C P /C A , from measured capture rates (see e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6]) as well as from angular correlations of the gamma emission following the capture reaction A Z X N + µ − → A Z−1 X * N +1 + ν µ of polarized muons (see e.g. [7][8][9]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, calculations with different nuclear models give very different predictions for this ratio. In [8] the values C P /C A = 3.4±1.0 and C P /C A = 2.0±1.6 were extracted using the matrix elements of [2,12], respectively. In addition, the measurement of [7] gives the estimates C P /C A = 5.3 ± 2.0 using the matrix elements of [2] and C P /C A = 4.2 ± 2.5 using the matrix elements of [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] the values C P /C A = 3.4 ± 1.0 and C P /C A = 2.0 ± 1.6 were extracted using the matrix elements of Refs. [2] and [12], respectively. In addition, the measurement of Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%