2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALMA 26 arcmin2 Survey of GOODS-S at 1 mm (ASAGAO): Near-infrared-dark Faint ALMA Sources

Abstract: We report detections of two 1.2 mm continuum sources (S 1.2mm ∼ 0.6 mJy) without any counterparts in the deep H-and/or K-band image (i.e., K-band magnitude 26 mag). These near-infrared-dark faint millimeter sources are uncovered by ASAGAO, a deep and wide-field (≃ 26 arcmin 2 ) Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) 1.2 mm survey. One has a red IRAC (3.6 and 4.5 µm) counterpart, and the other has been independently detected at 850 and 870 µm using SCUBA2 and ALMA Band 7, respectively. Their optica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
79
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
15
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that while our approach yields a clean selection of H−dropouts, roughly half of the true H−dropouts have been missed simply due to chance superposition of sources, which needs to be corrected. In fact, this completeness correction is consistent with recent findings from a blind ALMA survey, which reveals four H-dropouts (with [4.5] < 24) that were not picked up by our approach within an area of 1/3 of the GOODS-South filed 32,33 , in comparison to 12 sources selected by our approach in the whole GOODS-South field. Among these four sources, 3 of them have at least one HST counterpart within 2" (with the remaining one absent from our IRAC catalog, which is shallower than the one used in 32 ), which is inconsistent with being the right counterpart of the ALMA emission based on the redshift and other physical properties.…”
Section: Observations 1selection Of H−dropouts and Incompleteness Cosupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This suggests that while our approach yields a clean selection of H−dropouts, roughly half of the true H−dropouts have been missed simply due to chance superposition of sources, which needs to be corrected. In fact, this completeness correction is consistent with recent findings from a blind ALMA survey, which reveals four H-dropouts (with [4.5] < 24) that were not picked up by our approach within an area of 1/3 of the GOODS-South filed 32,33 , in comparison to 12 sources selected by our approach in the whole GOODS-South field. Among these four sources, 3 of them have at least one HST counterpart within 2" (with the remaining one absent from our IRAC catalog, which is shallower than the one used in 32 ), which is inconsistent with being the right counterpart of the ALMA emission based on the redshift and other physical properties.…”
Section: Observations 1selection Of H−dropouts and Incompleteness Cosupporting
confidence: 90%
“…If we focus on our sample with L18W and SPIRE detections, the mean SFR is 2240 M yr −1 because of requirement of FIR detection. These results are consistent with previous works reporting that SFRs of dusty galaxies tend to be high (e.g., Ikarashi et al 2017;Toba et al 2017b;Yamaguchi et al 2019;Fan et al 2020). Figure 10.…”
Section: Star Formation Ratesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We also parameterized redshift to estimate photometric redshift (z photo ), because by definition, our sample is optically too faint to obtain spectroscopic redshifts. Since the optically-dark galaxies tend to be located at z > 2 (e.g., Franco et al 2018;Yamaguchi et al 2019;Williams et al 2019;Wang et al 2019), we optimized the range of z photo , which reduces the computing time. Aside from being an excellent SED-fitting tool, CIGALE is known to be a good estimator of z photo , since it utilizes a large number of models covering the whole SED including the MIR-FIR regime.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ALMA deep surveys, which use many pointings to create a contiguous field, are another avenue of research to measure dust-obscured star-forming activity across the cosmic time (e.g., Tadaki et al 2015;Umehata et al 2015;Walter et al 2016;Dunlop et al 2017). Some of the galaxies identified by these types of surveys are known to be blank at the H-band ("HST-dark"; e.g., Franco et al 2018) and Ks-band (e.g., Umehata et al 2015;Yamaguchi et al 2016Yamaguchi et al , 2019. The existence of the near-infrareddark ALMA galaxies has also been uncovered using another approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%