2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2010.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost fixed-point-free automorphisms of soluble groups

Abstract: a b s t r a c tSuppose G is either a soluble (torsion-free)-by-finite group of finite rank or a soluble linear group over a finite extension field of the rational numbers. We consider the implications for G if G has an automorphism of finite order m with only finitely many fixed points. For example, if m is prime then G is a finite extension of a nilpotent group and if m = 4 then G is a finite extension of a centre-by-metabelian group. This extends the special cases where G is polycyclic, proved recently by En… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Theorem 2, Corollary 1 of [10] the group G/D has an abelian normal subgroup of finite index (trivially so if φ does not have order 2 on G/D since then G/D is finite). By Lemma 1(c) we can choose this abelian normal subgroup to be inverted by φ.…”
Section: Lemma 4 Let T Be a Periodic Group With An Afpf Automorphism mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By Theorem 2, Corollary 1 of [10] the group G/D has an abelian normal subgroup of finite index (trivially so if φ does not have order 2 on G/D since then G/D is finite). By Lemma 1(c) we can choose this abelian normal subgroup to be inverted by φ.…”
Section: Lemma 4 Let T Be a Periodic Group With An Afpf Automorphism mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, however, we replace the word 'periodic' in the definition of finite Hirsch number by 'locally finite', then certainly something can be said. The torsion-free case goes through more-or-less as before, see [10], and would lead to G/T being nilpotent-by-finite, but the locally finite case is more problematic. See [4] and especially [4] Theorem 1.2 for a discussion of this.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But A p satisfies the minimal condition (G satisfies min-p for all primes p recall). Therefore A p A p g for all p and A Ag G; f. Also if K=A C G=A f, then Lemma 1 of [4] yields that K : A n. Now suppose the A T 1 is a divisible abelian p-group (the case s 1). Then Ag is divisible and hence is a direct summand of A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%