1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01078125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost invariant spectral properties of a contraction and multiplicative properties of analytic operator-functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marchenko [35, Exercise 1.3.3] (2 × 2 Dirac system, B = diag(−1, 1)) and Yu.P. Ginzburg [18] (B = I n , Q = 0) (see Remark 4.5 below).…”
Section: It Is Clear That T a (C D) = T −A (D C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marchenko [35, Exercise 1.3.3] (2 × 2 Dirac system, B = diag(−1, 1)) and Yu.P. Ginzburg [18] (B = I n , Q = 0) (see Remark 4.5 below).…”
Section: It Is Clear That T a (C D) = T −A (D C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) In the case of the simplest operator L C,D = −iI n ⊗ d dx (B = I n , Q = 0), another (and rather complicated) proof of Corollary 4.3 was obtained in [18].…”
Section: Weakly Regular Bvp For Dirac Type Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marchenko [46, §1.3] (2 × 2 Dirac system) and V.P. Ginzburg [26] (B = I n , Q = 0). Our first main result (Theorem 4.1) states the completeness property for the general BVP (1.2)-(1.4) with non-weakly regular boundary conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26) and dom( L) = U dom(L) = y = col(y 1 , y 2 , y 3 , y 4 ) ∈ W 1,1 ([0, ℓ]; C 4 ) :Ly ∈ L 2 ([0, ℓ]; C 4 ), y 2 (0) = y 4 (0) = 0,y 1 (ℓ) + α 1 y 2 (ℓ) + β 1 y 4 (ℓ) = 0, y 3 (ℓ) + α 2 y 4 (ℓ) + β 2 y 2 (ℓ) = 0 . (7.27) Thus, the operator L is similar to the operator L, Ly = −i B(x)y ′ + Q(x)y (7.28)with the domain dom( L) given by(7.27), and the matrix functions B(·), Q(·), given byB(x) Q ∈ L 1 ([0, ℓ]; C 4×4) in view of conditions (7.6)-(7.7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) In case of the simplest operator L C,D = −iI n ⊗ d dx (B = I n , Q = 0), another (and rather complicated) proof of Corollary 4.3 was obtained in [17].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%