2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 2013
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2013.6620197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost lossless analog signal separation

Abstract: We propose an information-theoretic framework for analog signal separation. Specifically, we consider the problem of recovering two analog signals from a noiseless sum of linear measurements of the signals. Our framework is inspired by the groundbreaking work of Wu and Verdú (2010) on almost lossless analog compression. The main results of the present paper are a general achievability bound for the compression rate in the analog signal separation problem, an exact expression for the optimal compression rate in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower bound in (22) has an additional term (1−Ä+ÄD )a log[1+P(D ,p X )snr] on the right-hand side when compared with the result in Corollary 1 of [11]. When D → 0, the sampling rate-distortion function in (22) …”
Section: Remark 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The lower bound in (22) has an additional term (1−Ä+ÄD )a log[1+P(D ,p X )snr] on the right-hand side when compared with the result in Corollary 1 of [11]. When D → 0, the sampling rate-distortion function in (22) …”
Section: Remark 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e is usually called the gross error and its entries can have arbitrarily large magnitude. This problem and its variants have gained increasing attentions recently in terms of theoretical analysis [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. [15,16] investigated the sparse signal recovery from y = Ax + e, and provided the recovery guarantees when x is recovered with high probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations