2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost output regulation bumpless transfer control for switched linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the ith subsystem is activated, there easily follows ||K * x(t) − K i x(t)|| 2 < ||x(t)|| 2 with = √ 1 2 in Ω i , i ∈ . From the above analysis, we can see that (9)(10)(11) of Theorem 1 will be satisfied if (30)(31)(32)(33) hold. Therefore, the finite-time H ∞ bumpless transfer control problem is solvable for switched system (1) under switching law (8) and controller (3).…”
Section: Case 2: a Sliding Motion Existsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When the ith subsystem is activated, there easily follows ||K * x(t) − K i x(t)|| 2 < ||x(t)|| 2 with = √ 1 2 in Ω i , i ∈ . From the above analysis, we can see that (9)(10)(11) of Theorem 1 will be satisfied if (30)(31)(32)(33) hold. Therefore, the finite-time H ∞ bumpless transfer control problem is solvable for switched system (1) under switching law (8) and controller (3).…”
Section: Case 2: a Sliding Motion Existsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Remark 7. ij can be obtained by solving inequality conditions (30)(31)(32)(33). However, the solving condition in Theorem 2 is the nonconvex, which prevents application of standard LMI solution packages.…”
Section: Case 2: a Sliding Motion Existsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations