2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost sure invariance principles via martingale approximation

Abstract: International audienceIn this paper, we estimate the rest of the approximation of a stationary process by a martingale in terms of the projections of partial sums. Then, based on this estimate, we obtain almost sure approximation of partial sums by a martingale with stationary differences. The results are exploited to further investigate the central limit theorem and its invariance principle started at a point, the almost sure central limit theorem, as well as the law of the iterated logarithm via almost sure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5.14) This condition implies in particular that n≥1 h+K h+···+K n−1 h 2,ν n 3/2 < ∞. By Lemma 2 of [19] (and its proof), it follows that ϕ(Y 0 , Y 1 ) := lim n 1 n n j=1…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem For P =mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(5.14) This condition implies in particular that n≥1 h+K h+···+K n−1 h 2,ν n 3/2 < ∞. By Lemma 2 of [19] (and its proof), it follows that ϕ(Y 0 , Y 1 ) := lim n 1 n n j=1…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem For P =mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This condition follows directly from Theorem 12 of [19] together with the fact that (d k ) k∈N is a martingale differences sequence provided that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem For P =mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As already mentionned, ν admits a moment of order S − τ = p + (p − 1)τ . Hence, one can prove that condition (18) holds with r = p + τ (p − 1), by using the last statement of the following lemma (taking γ = (pr…”
Section: Lipschitz Autoregressive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While (4) and (2) coincide when p = 2, our method of proof is different from the one used in [24]. In Theorem 2.3, we shall consider also the case when p ∈ ]1, 2[.…”
Section: Martingale Approximations In Lpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned in the Introduction, having estimates of the approximation error of partial sums by a martingale can be useful to derive different kinds of limit theorems for the partial sums associated with a stationary process. For instance, starting from (2), Merlevède et al [24] have obtained sufficient projective conditions in order for the partial sums to satisfy either the law of the iterated logarithm or the almost sure central limit theorem. In this section, we shall use our estimate (7), either to give new projective conditions under which the partial sums associated with a stationary process satisfy a moderate deviations type results, or to analyze the rates of convergence in the CLT in terms of Wasserstein distances.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%