2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00394.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almotriptan is an Effective and Well-Tolerated Treatment for Migraine Pain: Results of A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract: Almotriptan is a novel and specific serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonist for the acute treatment of migraine. This randomized, single-dose, double-blind, multicentre, study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral almotriptan (12.5 mg and 25 mg) in patients with migraine, and compared it with the standard treatment (sumatriptan 100 mg) and placebo. A total of 668 patients treated one migraine attack of moderate or severe intensity with study medication. The primary efficacy assessment was migraine pain relief, improvem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
82
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sumatriptan 100 mg versus placebo-Of the 12 studies originally analysed comparing sumatriptan 50 mg with placebo for incidence of any adverse event within 24 hours, four offered participants a second dose of study medication and did not report adverse events according to the number of doses received (Dowson 2002;Ensink 1991;Goadsby 2000;Pfaffenrath 1998). Removing these studies from the analysis made no significant difference to the calculated relative risk of treatment versus placebo (analysis not shown).…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sumatriptan 100 mg versus placebo-Of the 12 studies originally analysed comparing sumatriptan 50 mg with placebo for incidence of any adverse event within 24 hours, four offered participants a second dose of study medication and did not report adverse events according to the number of doses received (Dowson 2002;Ensink 1991;Goadsby 2000;Pfaffenrath 1998). Removing these studies from the analysis made no significant difference to the calculated relative risk of treatment versus placebo (analysis not shown).…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Sumatriptan 100 mg versus placebo Dahlof 1991;DKSMSG 1999;Dodick 2002;Dowson 2002;Ensink 1991;Geraud 2000;Goadsby 1991;Goadsby 2000;Havanka 2000;Jelinski 2006;Kaniecki 2006;Mathew 2003;Myllyla 1998;Nappi 1994;Nett 2003;Patten 1991;Pfaffenrath 1998;Pini 1995;Sandrini 2002;Sargent 1995;Sheftell 2005 • Sumatriptan 100 mg versus diclofenac potassium 50 mg (DKSMSG 1999).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysisunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are methodological differences even when the unprompted method is used. In some trials, patients record the side effects in a headache diary [15], while in others the collection is also complemented by communication with the study coordinator [16]. Finally, some studies actively searched for the "incidence and nature of all serious adverse events (at any time before or after administration)" [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one comparative RCT [26] and in a meta-analysis [18,19] 12.5 mg almotriptan caused no more AEs than placebo and less AEs than 100 mg sumatriptan. In the comparative RCT [26] and in the meta-analysis [18,19] 12.5 mg almotriptan was comparable to 100 mg sumatriptan and apparently better for sustained freedom from pain in the metaanalysis [18,19]; but in one large comparative RCT [27] 50 mg sumatriptan (25%) was superior to 12.5 mg almotriptan (18%) for freedom from pain after 2 h and also better for sustained freedom from pain [28]. Pfizer (eletriptan) went for more efficacy, and in one systematic review of 3 comparative RCTs 40 mg sumatriptan was superior to 100 mg sumatriptan [29].…”
Section: Understanding a Paper On Drug Trials In Migrainementioning
confidence: 97%