Little information is available as to the real effectiveness of the phytoextraction remediation technique, since laboratory experiments are still the most common way in which this is measured. Given this, an experiment on a cadmium-polluted soil was carried out in open field conditions in Southern Italy with the aim of assessing the growth and the phytoextraction potential of giant reed (Arundo donax L). Compost fertilisation and Trichoderma harzianum A6 inoculations were used to verify the possibility of increasing the metal uptake of the crop. Biomass yield of giant reed in the first growth season (average 12.8 Mg ha -1 ) was not affected by the Cd concentration in the soil and this increased significantly with compost fertilisation (13.8 Mg ha -1 ). Both compost fertilisation and T. harzianum inoculation increased cadmium uptake and translocation in leaves. Nitrifying bacteria was shown to be a useful tool to biomonitor soil quality. These results proved the suitability of the giant reed for assisted-phytoremedation with the use of compost fertilisation and T. harzianum.
IntroductionThe extent of soil pollution by potentially toxic elements (PTE) in industrialised areas is well documented (Glass, 1998;Black, 1999) and represents an important environmental concern due to their potential accumulation in the food chain. Human activities such as industrial plants, mining, road transport and the unwise application of sewage sludges, fertilisers and pesticides to agricultural soils are recognised to be the main sources of PTE pollution (do Nascimento et al., 2006;Lado et al., 2008). A large number of methods are available to remediate soils, such as soil washing with synthetic surfactants. However, these are extremely expensive, such that a large number of sites remain contaminated (Ensley, 2000). Moreover, ex situ soil reclamation techniques lead to a big reduction in soil fertility due to the soil disturbance and to the toxicity of synthetic surfactants. Soil washing with humic substances extracted from composted organic matter or from geochemical deposits represents a reliable alternative (Conte et al., 2005) and phytoextraction is a valuable complementary technique. It is low cost and environmentally safe (Wu et al., 2006) and is able to both remove heavy metal pollutants from the soil and to offer important economic and agronomic advantages (Mattina et al., 2003). It involves the utilisation of plants to remove heavy metals from soil and concentrate them in the biomass. For years now, metal hyperaccumulating plants such as Alyssum murale, Berkheya coddii, Brassica juncea and Thlaspi caerulescens have been considered the most suitable tool to decontaminate metal-polluted soils, but the low biomass growth and scarce ability to accumulate various different metals together (Krämer, 2005) have discouraged their inclusion in commercial phytoextraction protocols (do Nascimento et al., 2006). Consequently, the current trend is to use fast-growing high biomass crops that accumulate moderate levels of metals in ...