Retroviruses depend on the virally encoded IN proteins to facilitate stable insertion of their reverse-transcribed genomes into host cell chromosomes. INs recognize the attachment (att) sites at the ends of long terminal repeats (LTRs) in viral DNA to carry out two sequential enzymatic reactions. In the first reaction, referred to as 3= processing, IN removes dinucleotides from the 3= ends of viral DNA to expose the 3= OH groups attached to the invariant CA dinucleotides. In the second reaction, DNA strand transfer, IN inserts the processed 3= termini into opposing strands of the host chromosomal DNA via a transesterification mechanism (1, 2). Host cell enzymes complete the process by repairing the single-stranded gaps on both sides of integrated viral DNA. Consequently, the resulting provirus is flanked by short duplications of the target DNA sequences. The duplication size appears to be retroviral genus specific, being 5 bp for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and 4 bp for murine leukemia virus (MLV) (3-5). The terminal cleavage and strand transfer steps can be observed in vitro with purified recombinant retroviral IN and DNA substrates, demonstrating that IN alone is sufficient to carry out these reactions (3, 6).Retroviral IN consists of three structural domains (reviewed in reference 7). The N-terminal domain (NTD) contains the zinc binding HHCC motif, and a highly conserved catalytic core domain (CCD) contains the essential active site Asp, Asp, and Glu (D, D-35-E motif) residues, which are directly involved in the catalytic activities of IN. The C-terminal domain (CTD) is least conserved (8-11). Mounting evidence suggests that IN functions as a tetramer (12-15). Recent crystal structures of the prototype foamy virus (PFV) IN bound to its viral and host DNA substrates revealed that all three IN domains participate in tetramerization and interactions with viral DNA (16,17).Retroviral integration into cellular DNA does not occur in a random manner with respect to various genomic features (reviewed in reference 18). HIV-1 and other lentiviruses show a remarkable preference for integration within active transcription units (19). In contrast, MLV, a gammaretrovirus, preferentially integrates near transcription start sites and CpG islands, features that are largely avoided by HIV-1 (20, 21). The remaining retroviral genera show other, albeit far less contrasting, integration patterns (22). Integration site selection of HIV-1 and other lentiviruses was shown to depend on the cellular protein lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF) (reviewed in reference 23). The IN binding domain (IBD) located within the C-terminal region of LEDGF mediates its interactions with HIV-1 and other lentiviral . LEDGF associates with chromatin via its N-terminal PWWP domain, which selectively binds to nucleosomes containing H3 trimethylated on Lys36 (27, 28), an epigenetic mark associated with bodies of transcription units (29). In cells depleted of LEDGF/p75, HIV-1 integration and replication were significantly affect...