2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13234802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alteration Detection of Multispectral/Hyperspectral Images Using Dual-Path Partial Recurrent Networks

Abstract: Numerous alteration detection methods are designed based on image transformation algorithms and divergence of bi-temporal images. In the process of feature transformation, pseudo variant information caused by complex external factors will be highlighted. As a result, the error of divergence between the two images will be further enhanced. In this paper, we propose to fuse the variability of Deep Neural Networks’ (DNNs) structure flexibly with various detection algorithms for bi-temporal multispectral/hyperspec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analysis has confirmed the followings. (1) CD-USNet [21] always outperforms CD-CSNet in UN_CHG coefficient, but underperforms in OA_CHG, this is the basis to establish our SDN; (2) deep learning-based frameworks (e.g., DSFA, CD-USNet, CD-CSNet) with linear slow feature analysis (L-SFA) do not always outperform the model (CD-FCN) without L-SFA in any coefficients. Nevertheless, L-SFA is definitely a positive for the improvement of comprehensive coefficients; (3) although two branches of the proposed schema, CD-SDN-AM and CD-SDN-AL, do not always perform the best in one-sided coefficients OA_CHG and OA_UN, they occupy the top two in comprehensive coefficients OA, Kappa, and F1.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical analysis has confirmed the followings. (1) CD-USNet [21] always outperforms CD-CSNet in UN_CHG coefficient, but underperforms in OA_CHG, this is the basis to establish our SDN; (2) deep learning-based frameworks (e.g., DSFA, CD-USNet, CD-CSNet) with linear slow feature analysis (L-SFA) do not always outperform the model (CD-FCN) without L-SFA in any coefficients. Nevertheless, L-SFA is definitely a positive for the improvement of comprehensive coefficients; (3) although two branches of the proposed schema, CD-SDN-AM and CD-SDN-AL, do not always perform the best in one-sided coefficients OA_CHG and OA_UN, they occupy the top two in comprehensive coefficients OA, Kappa, and F1.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To highlight the priority of the proposed CD-SDN, we compare it with the state-ofthe-art works: CVA [8], CD-FCN [20], DSFA [20], CD-USNet which we proposed in our previous work and was also known in [21], and the proposed CD-CSNet. Note that in our experiment, we adopt 5 × 10 −5 as the learning rate (LR) for FCN, DSFA, USNet, and CSNet.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As collaborative network members, the fully connected network (FCNet) is applied in the state-of-the-art model deep slow feature analysis (DSFA) [25]. With SFA, it demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality for change detection in hyperspectral images; the sensitivity disparity networks (SDN) [26], which consist of an unchanged sensitivity network (USNet) we have proposed in our previous work [27] and is also known as dual-path partial recurrent networks (D-PRNs); and a changed sensitivity network (CSNet). The special note is that the SDN members, USNet and CSNet, result from the fine-tuning of FCNet and extensive testing has proven that they are more sensitive to unchanged pixels and more sensitive to changed pixels, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%