Alterations in Peptidoglycan Cross-Linking Suppress the Secretin Assembly Defect Caused by Mutation of GspA in the Type II Secretion System

Abstract

In Gram-negative bacteria, the peptidoglycan (PG) cell wall is a significant structural barrier for outer membrane protein assembly. In Aeromonas hydrophila, outer membrane multimerization of the type II secretion system (T2SS) secretin ExeD requires the function of the inner membrane assembly factor complex ExeAB. The putative mechanism of the complex involves the reorganization of PG and localization of ExeD, whereby ExeA functions by interacting with PG to form a site for secretin assembly and ExeB forms an interaction with ExeD. This mechanism led us to hypothesize that increasing the pore size of PG would circumvent the requirement for ExeA in the assembly of the ExeD secretin. Growth of A. hydrophila in 270 mM Gly reduced PG cross-links by approximately 30% and led to the suppression of secretin assembly defects in exeA strains and in those expressing ExeA mutants by enabling localization of the secretin in the outer membrane. We also established a heterologous ExeD assembly system in Escherichia coli and showed that ExeAB and ExeC are the only A. hydrophila proteins required for the assembly of the ExeD secretin in E. coli and that ExeAB-independent assembly of ExeD can occur upon overexpression of the D,D-carboxypeptidase PBP 5. These results support an assembly model in which, upon binding to PG, ExeA induces multimerization and pore formation in the sacculus, which enables ExeD monomers to interact with ExeB and assemble into a secretin that both is inserted in the outer membrane and crosses the PG layer to interact with the inner membrane platform of the T2SS. IMPORTANCEThe PG layer imposes a strict structural impediment for the assembly of macromolecular structures that span the cell envelope and serve as virulence factors in Gram-negative species. This work revealed that by decreasing PG crosslinking by growth in Gly, the absolute requirement for the PG-binding activity of ExeA in the assembly of the ExeD secretin was alleviated in A. hydrophila. In a heterologous assembly model in E. coli, expression of the carboxypeptidase PBP 5 could relieve the requirement for ExeAB in the assembly of the ExeD secretin. These results provide some mechanistic details of the ExeAB assembly complex function, in which the PG-binding and oligomerization functions of ExeAB are used to create a pore in the PG that is required for secretin assembly.KEYWORDS type II secretion system, peptidoglycan, secretin assembly T he secretion of protein toxins and enzymes via the type II secretion system (T2SS) is an important virulence mechanism as well as a major route of scavenging enzyme secretion and surface protein assembly for many Gram-negative bacteria (1-4). The T2SS is a large complex composed of 12 to 15 highly conserved proteins designated

Peptidoglycan Remodeling Enables Escherichia coli To Survive Severe Outer Membrane Assembly Defect

“…We also envision another possible reason why LDTs are essential upon defective LPS export. The size of pores in the PG net is too small for large transenvelope assemblies, such as the flagella and type II secretion systems, and hence, the assembly of these requires the local hydrolysis of the PG to increase the pore size ( 64 , 65 ). The width of the periplasmic Lpt “bridge” together with its bulky LPS cargo ( 19 , 66 ) is likely wider than the diameter of pores in PG (4.1 to 6.2 nm, depending on the turgor), necessitating the local hydrolysis of the PG, by an as yet unknown PG hydrolase, for the assembly of the Lpt machinery and rapid flux of LPS to the cell surface.…”

Genome-wide analysis inEscherichia coliunravels an unprecedented level of genetic homoplasy associated with cefotaxime resistance

“…To the best of our knowledge no relationship between type II secretion system and CTX resistance has been observed before. One could hypothesize that the mutation is a secondary adaptation needed to cope with the elevated AmpC production, as the peptidoglycan (PG) layer is effected by AmpC hyperproduction and the type II secretion system contains proteins that are partly localized in the periplasm [50,51].…”

The trans‐envelope architecture and function of the type 2 secretion system: new insights raising new questions

“…Several recent studies shed light on the role of GspA ATPase-PG binding to create a pore large enough for secretin biogenesis. In support of this role, mutations or conditions that increase the pore size of the PG mesh suppress secretin biogenesis defects created by the absence of the GspAB complex (Howard et al, 2006;Li and Howard, 2010;Strozen et al, 2011;Li et al, 2011;Howard, 2013;Vanderlinde et al, 2017).…”

“…Together the AP and GspE assemble a filamentous sub‐complex called the pseudopilus that is predominantly composed of multiple copies of the major pseudopilin subunit GspG (Sauvonnet et al ., ; Vignon et al ., ; Durand et al ., ) and might contain minor pseudopilins GspH, I, J and K. The IM prepilin peptidase GspO removes the N‐terminal anchor peptide allowing for pseudopilin maturation, which is essential for fibre assembly (Dupuy et al ., ; Pugsley and Dupuy, ). In a subset of T2SSs, a complex comprising IM proteins GspA and GspB participates in secretin biogenesis by binding to peptidoglycan (Howard et al ., ; Li and Howard, ; Li et al ., ; Strozen et al ., ; Vanderlinde et al ., ), whereas other systems only have GspB homologues (Pugsley et al ., ). Another IM component, GspN, is not present in all systems and it is not required for secretion in Acinetobacter baumanii and Klebsiella oxytoca , suggesting that some components might be redundant or might play accessory roles (DeShazer et al ., ; Possot et al ., ; Johnson et al ., ).…”